User talk:TDFan2006/archive5
YES! edit
The (stupid) block (which I didn't deserve) has expired! Yes! The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 09:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, why were you blocked? —Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 17:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Everybody began to think I was socking, when I wasn't. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Where was that decided? I'm just curious and wanna see the discussion, because the one in your Archive 4 doesn't seem to mention you. —Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TDFan2006 The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. That explains why the other link didn't go there. Thanks! —Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TDFan2006 The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Where was that decided? I'm just curious and wanna see the discussion, because the one in your Archive 4 doesn't seem to mention you. —Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Everybody began to think I was socking, when I wasn't. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
It seems that this AfD which you opened was never added to the daily log (step III in WP:AFDHOW). There is a bot which normally does that if the filer did not, but somehow this got missed, and so nobody noticed that it had never been closed. This note is to let you know that, since the article has been expanded, and it is confirmed that the channel will open on 9 June, I have invoked WP:IAR to close the AfD as keep, rather than relist it and give it another seven days. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the {{hoax}} tag that you placed on The BOX (New Zealand), as a quick check indicates to me that this is not a complete hoax. This is not an endorsement of the article as it is presently written and I agree with your other tag flagging the article as needing references.
Tagging an article as a possible hoax is a serious accusation and it should not be done in a drive-by manner. If you must tag an article as a possible hoax, please use the talk page or at the minimum the edit summary to explain why you believe it is a hoax. The {{disputed}} tag is also available for articles which are not completely false but have serious factual accuracy issues, but that tag should also be explained on the talk page or in an edit summary. —KuyaBriBriTalk 00:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Okay okay. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:CBBC 2005 logo.jpg edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CBBC 2005 logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BBC Three may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | replaced by names = [[BBC One #BBC One +1|BBC One +1
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)