Suzichi, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Suzichi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

No she is not. Please stop to vandalize Novak page, there is neutral to be only parents Srđan and Dijana, without nationalism. Thank you.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

5 min. 38 sec. Novak father talking about his family: We are Serb, and we always be Serbs no matter where we went. About ethnicity [1].--Soundwaweserb (talk) 11:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Srđan declared all of them as Serbian, not only himself, all family including Dijana, btw who is born in Belgrade, not in Vinkovci.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 12:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

My source is best. Your second irrelevant source about Pilic, there is nothing saying about Dijana! And Slobodna Dalmacija is yellow press, not good source and there is no the truth.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 12:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nikola Pilic is not like you. You are nationalist. In that interview for slovenian media, he didnt say anything about Novak mother. Please just stop with this, we are talking about this in past and there is no consensus for you agenda. If you continue to vandalize, you will be blocked. Greeting.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Novak Djokovic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Novak Djokovic. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Vanjagenije (talk) 15:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Novak Djokovic. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Vanjagenije (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Novak Djoković ethnicity edit

Hi. I posted a source that can help your discussion, however it's futile to discuss with people who see it as an insult to say that Djokovic's parents aren't Serbs. You can open a RfC to attract other non-biased editors. I hope the source can help you. I've pulled it out from this discussion. Searcher11 (talk) 17:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi , here's an example how to open a rfc [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Searcher11 (talkcontribs) 21:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I see you have opened a rfc, however your question is unclear. You should reform it like this. Should "Djokovic was born on 22 May 1987 in Belgrade, SR Serbia, Yugoslavia, to parents Srđan and Dijana (née Žagar). be changed to: "Djokovic was born on 22 May 1987 in Belgrade, SR Serbia, Yugoslavia, to parents Srđan and Dijana (née Žagar). His father is Montenegrin and his mother Croatian from Vinkovci". That would be a clear question. Searcher11 (talk) 13:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

You can also state that you agree with the change as the editor who had opened the rfc.Searcher11 (talk) 14:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016 edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Novak Djokovic. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Novak Djokovic edit

You provided this link[3] saying that it shows Djokovic's father mentioning "The truth is that my wife is Croatian". It's a Serbian source mentioned. It seems that the link is broken as it doesn't show that information. I was going to ask if you knew where this source is.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 01:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gornje Jame massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply