Surjit12

Hi I found that you had blocked me, I found no reason why some one had blocked me, I have always tried to write genuine work based on proper authentication and reference, When ever I have contribute in the Wikipedia either it have been re-modified by unknown user or being deleted or being redirected for no reason, I mostly write about Kochrajbongshi community, which are based on my genuine work, I belongs to this community and I know much better than any one, I don't understand How any one can remove my page called "Kamatapur Movement" which I have written based on genuine work with proper authentication and reference cited in the every paragraph that I have written, Kindly do have a second look what ever I have contributed, I feel I have been discriminated by some of the anti Kochrajbongshi Community People of Anti Kamatapuri People.
When ever I write about Kochrajbongshi community some one or other will remove my original work, or delete the page for no reason, Kochrajbohgsi community can be found in both Assam and West Bengal, The historic Kamatapur later on Joined with the Indian territory after the independence of the Indian domain from the British, the entire lower assam was the part of the Kamatapur, the present North Bengal was the part of the Kamatapur Kingdom, the Kochrajbongsi people are demanding separate state within the Indian territory which is their birth right, I have just added about the Kochrajbongshi culture and community in Assam, Immediately it was deleted, How you can delete about Kochrajbongshi culture from the page of Assam, We are the majority of the state, same thing with the North Bengal page, it is being deleted immediately, When I wrote about the folk song, it was deleted immediately for no reason, I found it very miscevious act from some unknown people, who are against my genuine work. Welcome!

Hello, Surjit12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 19:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello for your kind information Koch rajbongshi People page have been contributed by me based on the genuine work, you are trying to make new story out of your own imagination, I celarly found it injustice, where you contribut a lot and some one from the erstwhile come and say you are vandalizing the work here, Kindly have a second look , I do not understand who is this "Vigyani" I found every time I upload some genuine work about the Koch rajbongshi you put your nose into it? are you anti Kochrajbongsi or anti Kamatapuri? That is your personal choice if you do not like my community, but you do not have any right to put a finger about my own work which I have contributed in the Wikipedia, Come on, Please keep your prejudice aside, We live in a global world, if you hate our community, that is your personal choice, please do not bring into the professional life, and kindly leave me alone and my community, You have literally spoiled lots of my orignal work which I have contribute after a lots of research work done by me, you have literally spoiled hard work, God Bless YOU and give you some wisdom. Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to North Bengal, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shovon (talk) 08:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Koch Rajbongshi people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 19:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Kamata movement

Hello it is not copied from any other page, it is being written by my, when I found that those materials are also removed, I intended to write it separately because some one is deleting what every I upload, Now the same this is being done, again my new article is being deleted for no reason, or baseless reason, What ever I have written, after every paragraph, I have given citation and reference, so there is no copyright violence, neither there is any plagiarism because all the work are based on genuine work and not the copied one. But still injustice prevails, God Bless You who eve is against my genuine work, God Give You some knowledge and wisdom.

Hello, Surjit12, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Kamata movement, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Kamatapur movement. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

1. a link to the article you copied from
2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Kamata movement

Hello the Kamata Movement which you found that it is dublication work, Those work have been contribute by me, When I found that my genuine work is being removed from the Kamata Movement Page, I thought to write in a separate page called "Kamatapur Movement" Even I found late on that the same page is being deleted for no reason, It was stated that copyring violation or something like that, I would like to tell that, those work are based on my genuine work, and every reference is being cited after every paragraph, I clearly understood that this is being done by anti kamatapuri or anti Kochrajbongshi Individual, I would like to appeal to unblock me and allow me to write my original work,

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kamata movement. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kamatapur movement. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kamatapur movement – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fiddle Faddle 20:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kamatapur movement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kamatapur movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sentinelassam.com/mainnews/story.php?sec=1&subsec=0&id=173630&dtP=2013-10-25&ppr=1#173630. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 20:36, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for a number of reasons, most importantly persistent copyright infringements. You have been told that you must not copy content from elsewhere into Wikipedia articles, but you have continued to do so. This is not just a matter of Wikipedia policy: it is a matter of law. Also, there are other problems with your editing, some of which you have already been told about, and I won't repeat everything you have been told, but I will mention a few points. Please don't create several copies of one article under different titles, or substantially the same article. Doing so creates numerous problems, such as difficulties in ensuring that updates, corrections, and so on get applied to every copy. It is essential that all editing of Wikipedia articles be done from a neutral point of view. Saying, for example, that something is "very much legitimate for the community" has no place in any Wikipedia article, because it is an opinion, not an objective fact. Likewise "It is personal and sacred communion which they share within their brotherhood" does not belong in Wikipedia. Before editing again after the block ends, please re-read and carefully consider all the messages you have been given about problems with your editing, so that you can avoid making similar mistakes again. Do not keep making the same edit over and over again when you find other editors undo your edits. Doing so, known as edit warring, is considered unhelpful, and a much better way to deal with disagreements is to explain the reasons the reasons why you think your edits are good, and be prepared to discuss the issues, with a view to trying to reach agreement. Above all, do not copy and paste content to Wikipedia articles from other sources, which is likely to infringe copyright: doing so is likely to lead to a much longer block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JamesBWatson (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Problems with your editing

Hi.. I am Vigyani, who has been putting his nose into your work and have spoiled your so called original and genuine work. I do not have anything against you or your community. For your benefit I will explain to you, the problems with your editing pattern.

1. The articles you created contained massive chunks of text copied from some other websites. Copying from other websites is not allowed as this is a copyright violation. Read Wikipedia:Copyright violations.
2. Then you created multiple duplicate articles with same/similar contents but under different titles. Again that is useless, for each topic we have only one article. If you actually wanted to use all possible spellings then you should have used redirects, which I actually converted your duplicate articles into.
3. The Wikipedia articles are to be written in a neutral way, it is not for hosting propaganda of your statehood demands. Read WP:NOT
4. You were given several messages and served with various notices related to your editing. But you conveniently choose to ignore them. Due to you continuing with rules violations, you were blocked.
5. You went ahead and created a new account yourself, which is again a violation. Read WP:SOCK. It is now that you were blocked on your new account also, that you are using this talk page. So do not cry discrimination and try to learn some rules.

There is less then a day left in your block on this account. You will unblocked after that, but if you continue to behave in the same way, you will be blocked again. Plus if you want, you can request an early unblock by using the procedure given in your block notice. --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 05:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)