User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2010/September
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Supreme Deliciousness. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you
Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Arabic?
How good is your arabic? Chesdovi (talk) 09:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Analphabet. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Fantastic! Orionist found the Arabic version of Jobar. If you can use it as a springboard to find RS, we can improve the article. Thanks. Chesdovi (talk) 09:54, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Socks
I've noticed your obsession with socks. There is procedure for putting evidence forward. Usually it does not involve discussion on the article talk pages, since it creates huge issues for productive discussion. Please consider it. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 01:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- What talkpage? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 01:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Any article talk page. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 02:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove discussion from talk pages as you did here. It makes it very difficult to check out your assertions. Fred Talk 04:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- They were comments from a banned editor who have disrupted Wikipedia many times.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 09:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:SyrianArabNewsAgency.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:SyrianArabNewsAgency.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
IP WP:SPI
Hi, do you have experience filing SPI requests? If you have information linking the IP to the account, would you mind filing the SPI request to run in parallel with the AE? Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 21:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- I started one here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Breein1007. --Dailycare (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Supreme Deliciousness. If you have information that you believe links Breein1007 to the IP editor which is not suitable for posting in the SPI, can you send it to me by email? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Barada Beer Photo
Hey, the photo you uploaded of Barada Beer should be uploaded to English Wiki and not the Commons, because it contains an image of a branded logo. Although in some countries Freedom of Panorama (FOP) allows photographs taken in public locations to be exempt from certain copyright restrictions, it does not apply to the beer photo since it is in a restaurant. In addition, Syrian law (at least what little I can find in English) does not seem to allow FOP.
Anyhow, the photo should be deleted from the commons and a low-resolution image uploaded to English Wiki and licensed/styled like your hummus photo.
If you have any questions, let me know. Regards, --nsaum75¡שיחת! 03:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Deletion request
Done — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Do you have the full quote from Joseph Massad? Thanks, --Ravpapa (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
George's comment
SD, George's comment is reasoned pretty well, I'm not sure I agree with George fully. I've also asked Nab to comment. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- I also ignore those details some times, but for sake of clarity, could you consider to sign your comment. Did you read George's comment? We're talking about images. WP is not a forum. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 20:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I read his comment, that's why I asked him about his comment about the image for the article, what does that have to do with a forum? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Agree, some discussion could be helpful. 10x for responding. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Attributing to international community could be hard. We could attribute to UN, EC or Arab League, the list continues....AgadaUrbanit (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Discuss Golan Heights issues at its talkpage, not here. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- This edit remained unexplained on talk page. Maybe this might be relevant: Wikipedia:Don't revert due to "no consensus". I find tampered argument hard to follow. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- If my edit remained "unexplained" as you say, then what is all of this:[1] ? WP:DRdt"nc" is an essay written by any Wikipedia editors. It is not a rule or anything anyone has to follow. But I have actually followed it since that essay say that "But you neglected to explain why you personally disagree with the edit, so you haven't given people a handle on how to build the consensus with you that you desire.....Moreover, if you can't point out an underlying problem with an edit, there is no good reason to immediately revert it".. in this case we have been over this in detail at the talkpage in long discussions, and your revert did not follow what happened at the talkpage. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for response, I just noticed it. Let me get some sleep, we're probably are going to have a long talk ;). Stay cool, AgadaUrbanit (talk) 01:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- If my edit remained "unexplained" as you say, then what is all of this:[1] ? WP:DRdt"nc" is an essay written by any Wikipedia editors. It is not a rule or anything anyone has to follow. But I have actually followed it since that essay say that "But you neglected to explain why you personally disagree with the edit, so you haven't given people a handle on how to build the consensus with you that you desire.....Moreover, if you can't point out an underlying problem with an edit, there is no good reason to immediately revert it".. in this case we have been over this in detail at the talkpage in long discussions, and your revert did not follow what happened at the talkpage. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- This edit remained unexplained on talk page. Maybe this might be relevant: Wikipedia:Don't revert due to "no consensus". I find tampered argument hard to follow. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Discuss Golan Heights issues at its talkpage, not here. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I read his comment, that's why I asked him about his comment about the image for the article, what does that have to do with a forum? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Homs/Hims Categories
You commented on the Homs/Hims discussion, so I am notifying you of the current Category discussion at: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 6#Category:Hims. --Bejnar (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)