Sunny singh shera
August 2016 edit
Hello, I'm Meiloorun. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rudrama Devi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 22:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Sunny singh shera, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Sunny singh shera! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC) |
List of Kammas edit
September 2016 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kamma (caste). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Sanctions edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Enough is enough. You have had enough warnings and explanations, including at least one that you deleted from this talk page today. Any more violations of WP:BLP and I think you will find yourself sanctioned as per the above provisions. Source everything, and in the case of living people be extremely sure that they self-identify in the source. I refer you again to User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. - Sitush (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016 edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kamma (caste).
You have yet again added violations of our policy regarding biographies of living people. Stop. Sitush (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)