January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Shylock (2020 film) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Wikipedia is not interested in editors' personal opinions. Any opinion added to an article must be directly attributed to a reliable source that makes those determinations, and it must be written in neutral language, unlike the promotional content you submitted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

And don't submit fabricated content as you did here. IBT is pretty clear that the film grossed 38-40 crore by the end of its run, which is a far cry from the "85+" you pulled out of thin air. This change is indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shylock (2020 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Abrahaminte Santhathikal, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply