Speedy deletion nomination of Tabandeh

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Tabandeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jaydec (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Mahboubalishah

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mahboubalishah, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://sufism.ws/rahbaran-tarighat/55-en.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mahboubalishah, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sufism.ws/rahbaran-tarighat/55-en.php. As a copyright violation, Mahboubalishah appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mahboubalishah has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mahboubalishah and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Mahboubalishah with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mahboubalishah.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios

edit

Quite apart from being a copyvio, Hazrate Soltan Ali Shah was written in a nauseatingly sychophantic tone quite inappropriate for an encyclopedia. These guys may be notable and if you were to write proper articles about them, they might stick. But copy&pasting will simply get you blocked. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

October 2009

edit

  All of your editing to date seems to consist of adding direct copies of pages from elsewhere on the internet. You have been given warnings above for a sample of your copyright violations, but there have been others too. If you continue to add copyright material you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hazrate Rahmat Ali Shah

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hazrate Rahmat Ali Shah, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://tasavuf.ir/rahbaran-tarighat/49-en.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazrate Rahmat Ali Shah

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Hazrate Rahmat Ali Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Favonian (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazrat Majzoub Ali Shah the First

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Hazrat Majzoub Ali Shah the First requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit

You clearly did not read any of the above so I have blocked you briefly. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mahboubalishah

edit
 

The article Mahboubalishah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

1) a personal opinion piece not suitable for an encyclopedia (WP:NPOV)

2) a possible violation of copyright: "subject to honesty" is vague

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mahboubalishah, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://sufism.ws/rahbaran-tarighat/55-en.php, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mahboubalishah saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. If you are connected to this website, please place a usable licensing release on it. I'm afraid that what it currently displays is insufficient for Wikipedia's needs. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
In fact, if you want them to stand any chance of staying here, you will need to completely re-write each piece as an encyclopedia article. So copyright considerastions will not apply. 22:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)