Can I suggest that the entry labled Torsion_spring#Torsion_balance be split into two distinct entries.

The entry on torsion springs seems to confuse two types of mechanical function: the torsion (rotational resistance and elacticity) and the use of helical springs (which don't use rotational elacticity so much as normal bending resistance, while being wound in a helical spiral)

The torsion balance deserves its own entry. It is one of the most precise experimental tools ever developed, and when grouped with mousetraps, the whole subject is confused. Stewart Fist 01:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael G. Porter edit

 

The article Michael G. Porter has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Michael G. Porter edit

 

The article Michael G. Porter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:34, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply