Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Hanja, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Joyous! Noise! 20:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Hanja, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ZimZalaBim talk 20:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hanja, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hanja was changed by Steakcompositionleaf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940323 on 2024-06-04T20:41:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. You have two experienced editors telling you that removing huge amounts of material from an article with a very short, vague explanation is not appropriate. If you have problems with the article, start a discussion on the talk page of the article. If you continue to just strip material with no explanation or consensus, you'll end up blocked from editing. Joyous! Noise! 20:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruptive removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Joyous! Noise! 20:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at South Korea, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You were recently blocked and now your are again removing content without proper edit summaries or discussion. This is disruptive. ZimZalaBim talk 22:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steakcompositionleaf (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Since you don't see how your editing was disruptive, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steakcompositionleaf (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I apologize. I did not read the explanations thoroughly, and my previous explanation was not regarding that. Now I understand what disruptive editing is. I will not remove large amounts of content from articles especially unnecessarily.Steakcompositionleaf (talk) 03:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You clearly knew your edits were disruptive before you were blocked. This doesn't explain why you edited in that manner. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steakcompositionleaf (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can somebody please unblock me please? I honestly do not know why I removed large amounts of information from the Hanja article. To be honest, I currently live in America, “stupid community thing,” so it was probably people around me thinking these things, which coerced me into acting stupidly. Thank you. It will not occur again, Wikipedia.Steakcompositionleaf (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am not impressed by your unblock request. You blame others for your mistakes. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Steakcompositionleaf (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steakcompositionleaf (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have learned from my mistake. Removing large amounts of information is incorrect. Therefore, I am appealing my block. Steakcompositionleaf (talk) 02:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The requests are getting repetitive and tedious, so I figured I'd have a look at the contributions in other articles, and I see nothing there to make me think that the editor either has the skill set or the intention to contribute positively. Drmies (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.