Now the are glad I don't have the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia to a better good, because am being blocked. i am here to contribute not to accuse, i have never accuse any multiple accounts.

Welcome!

edit

Hi Steadee! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! weeklyd3 (message me | my contributions) 02:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Steadee! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Uricdivine (talk) 22:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Juiceslf (musician)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Juiceslf (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 06:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Citation have been added, to increase notability. Steadee (talk) 00:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Juiceslf (musician) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juiceslf (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juiceslf (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Htanaungg (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I said no to deletion, because it have some notability. a tagger should be added to add and improve notability-Steadee (talk)

That's why i say a tagger should be added to improve notability of the article, we are all here to improve Wikipedia to a better good-Steadee (talk)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Steadee. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

haven't ever abuse account I was just contesting for deleting of an article as a contributor and the accuse me to blocked-Steadee (talk)

I am not Sockpuppet am just contributing an the accuse me. I am from nigeria while the other user is from canada. Check information on the talk page I request to be unblocked, because I love Wikipedia and wish only to contribute to a better good. Steadee (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I only contribute good edits. Steadee (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

You were literally editing the deletion discussion from the same IP and device. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

No I haven't done such a thing I have my one user page steadee never knew the other user. Steadee (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Talk page access revoked due to continued denial of the blatant technical connection. WP:UTRS is available for appeals.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Chiscomalaga per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chiscomalaga. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #62940

edit

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply