User talk:StartOkayStop/Archive 1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Rollback and Pending Changes Reviewer
Hello StartTerminal. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.
- Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).
- The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Regarding the Wicker Man
I'm sorry, but there is information on the "Spiritual sequel" section of the Wicker Man article which has been mentioned before, rendering it redundant to the reader, and which has been haphazardly written. I don't see why it shouldn't be deleted. 89.164.194.118 (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Read the warning. startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 01:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
I at least deserve an explanation on why you think it is vandalism. 89.164.194.118 (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm StartTerminal. I noticed that in this edit to The Wicker Man, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 01:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
I explained that it was redundant and unnecessary, is that not enough? Is removing unnecessary information against the rules? 89.164.194.118 (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
They both have different information. You could of combined them. startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 01:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
On Jin Ki-joo
Uh I'm not sure why my edit was deemed as unconstructive. If you go look at 54th Baeksang Arts Awards, she was nominated for Best New Actress (Film) and not Best Supporting Actress (Film). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.43.184 (talk) 04:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
My apologies. Next time, use the edit summary :) startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 04:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The Man Show
I think this article is going to be repeatedly hit, so can you contact an admin to protect the page or something? --UltimateKuriboh (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Do it yourself! That's the great thing about wikipedia! Also, no, I do not have some special connection to the admins.
I apologize
I wasn't trying to do deconstructive edits. I just saw what I thought was a minor error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.140.2 (talk) 12:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| In recognition of all the work you do, keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism. You would make a great admin! Redlightgreen (talk) 03:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks! If you still remember me years in the future, feel free to nominate me :) (but not yet -- I'm not nearly experienced enough!) startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 03:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
"Exciting in here, isn't it"
Hey. Someone came into the #wikipedia IRC channel with the name "startTerminal". I'd assume this is you. They said a line (above) and left. I replied literally the second you left. The more active channel is #wikipedia-en, in case you were looking for it. Thanks, Vermont | reply here 00:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Vermont: Yep, that was me. Thanks for letting me know! startTerminal (haha wow talk page) 00:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Citrus Juice
Howdy, I saw you closed the above AFD 19 hours after !voting in it, which is generally considered bad form under WP:BADNAC, and also the AFD was only a day old. Personally, I don't forsee any other outcome and doubt there would be much benefit to leaving the discussion open for a full week, but please don't close discussions you have participated in. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 02:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for letting me know. startTerminal (haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc) 20:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Vandalism warning
Template:Vandalism warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hut 8.5 19:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Extended confirmed on your alternate account...
... has been assigned per your request at RFPP. Cheers, --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)