Images on many wikipedias edit

Please do not unilaterally replace perfectly good images on multiple wikipedias with those of your own without discussion. I especially refer to pictures of the Old Well at UNC-Chapel Hill where the image you added was of the wrong aspect ratio for almost all the pages and of inferior composition. Thank you. 71.70.143.158 (talk) 01:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. I was just being bold until told otherwise, as I thought my image was of superior quality and much higher resolution. I see what you are saying about the ratio, and I apologise for interfering with your work. What is the best way to go about proposing new images for the UNC article? I'm adding a large number of what I personally consider good images to the Wikimedia Commons and would like to at least offer them to the Wikipedia community. --Specious (talk) 02:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

UNC Photos edit

We could certainly have two pictures. A good photo of Polk Place would certainly be better than the one captioned "Campus in the summer". A better picture of Old East with the Old Well in the foreground would also be useful if you happen to be in the area, as would one of the Rameses statue at Kenan Stadium as I just took a quick cell phone picture as I walked by. I don't have a preference about people in photos.

If you're looking for things to photograph on campus, other articles that could possibly do with better pictures are:

Not all of those might be possible at the moment because of construction work, though. --Hippo (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perfect! I'll take this list with me on my future visits to UNC. Tonight, though, I'll be uploading photos of Battle Park and Franklin Street -- perhaps not the most exciting photos. The photo of Old East (with the well) illustrates the section on student housing. Would perhaps a shot of one of the bigger dorms be more illustrative? Also, I'd like to mention that I found some buildings to be difficult subjects due to obstructions, like Phillips. --Specious (talk) 06:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikimapia edit

Hi. I saw your post on Jimbo Wales's talk page and think it would be a great idea. The ones who work on geography here have long thought wikimapia the best site for obtaining coordinates, particularly on smaller settlements and landmarks. I would like to see wikimapia taken under the wiing of the wikimedia personally as it is the mapping project we are missing. What my goal is is to have an encyclopedia articles on every one of the features on wikimapia. I would very much like to see wikimapia adopted by wikimedia and to becoming a branch of our project. That would be awesome. Dr. Blofeld White cat 09:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


Wikimapia edit

Please DO NOT recommend further co-operation with this site, at best thier terms of use are unhelpful.

In addition concerns have been raised as to what if any thier commerical relationship with the data providers their imagery is sourced from

Why not work with geo-data projects that are genuinely 'free' like Open Street Map?

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to shut down WP Geographic Coordinates & ban coordinates on wikipedia articles edit

This means you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle edit

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
 
Seattle Public Library
  • Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
  • Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
  • Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
  • Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
  • Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
  • Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Specious. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Specious. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Specious. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply