SpacePope
First of all, my being a fan of the band is not an issue here. I don't care what genre they fall under. I'm not one of those dumbasses that refuses to let Fall Out Boy be called emo because then I'd be an emo music fan. I don't care. The point is, we have sources stating that the band does not refer to themselves as emo or pop punk. If you bothered to read the article that I spent a lot of time and effort to get to GA, you'd know this. Stop ignoring warnings on the edit page, stop altering sourced information. The google search results for the official website is insufficient. We have interviews cited in the article in where Wentz states that they are neither emo nor pop punk. Don't attempt to start an edit war with me. It will end up in arbitration. Hit up the talk page, and I'll be glad to discuss the issues with you. We can determine the whys and hows and work from there. Edit summaries are not the place for such discussions. Lara♥Love 19:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Food for your mind:
- I don't care what genre they are. I just want the article to be accurate, sourced, encyclopedia and stable. There are sources that say everything. We have to determine what is most accurate. What the majority of reliable sources say. Going to the band is no help. Their MySpace says one thing, but they say "No, that's just for categorizing us, that's not what we are." Trust. I think they're pop-punk. Personally, I'd go with that, but that's not consensus, and that's not what can necessarily be backed up by sources. I'm not attacking you here. I've been there, done this. The disputed sub-genres is the best we can do until the band stops being douches about their genre, refusing to be "labeled". Lara♥Love 19:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's in the sources. I'll have to go through everything and figure out what says what. I didn't write much of that part of the article. Fluence, who you seriously don't want to get into it with, did most of it. The disputed sub genre section is the compromise that was reached. And I don't agree that Rock is an acceptable genre. They don't fall into Rock, in my opinion. I agree with Alternative because (I'll double check, but I'm pretty sure on this), we found that many reliable sources state Alternative. Personally, I think pop-punk is correct, but Fluence won't let that be, I don't think. Lara♥Love 19:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Just don't alter it for a day or so. I have to go to work, but I'll look over the sources when I get back. This discussion really needs to take place on the article talk page so that the arguments can be weighed should Fluence or someone else come along and dispute it. It's only a matter of time before a third party is going to be called in to resloved this never-ending issue. Lara♥Love 20:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:WMseal.gif edit
Thanks for uploading Image:WMseal.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Esrever 20:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:WMseal.gif edit
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WMseal.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Esrever 20:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
File:WTTW06.gif listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WTTW06.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
