Sopiknfram

Sopiknfram, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Sopiknfram! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm Rmosler2100. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with

" title="South Yemen">Revision as of 19:31, 14 February 2014</a> (<a href="/w/index.php?title=South_Yemen&action=edit&oldid=595528300" title="South Yemen">edit</a>)

<a href="/w/index.php?title=User:Sopiknfram&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new mw-userlink" title="User:Sopiknfram (page does not exist)">Sopiknfram</a> (<a href="/wiki/User_talk:Sopiknfram" title="User talk:Sopiknfram">talk</a>  this edit to South Yemen, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rmosler | ● 06:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sukhoi Su-30 and other articles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. -Fnlayson (talk) 10:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)