Sophisticated-Gamer

It would appear that you are following a fixed template to create Wikipedia pages for Set Enterprises games. While there is nothing wrong with documenting them per se, it would be helpful if you could refrain from the steadfast usage of ®s and, for your "Educational Value" and "Awards" section, actually cited your sources. Both would be good first steps towards a more encyclopedic style (and that, if my conjecture of your aim being to popularize the games is correct, would also bring you better to that goal as quality articles can be reasonably assumed to be better received than what might be perceived as mass advertisment plugging). --4bpp (talk) 23:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Five Crowns (game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Five Crowns (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Crowns (game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Five Crowns (game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Five Crowns (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Crowns (game) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 20:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Set Cubed

The article Set Cubed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Reliant on primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 10:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)