Sooty655

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

• Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
• The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
• Quick Introductions to:

• Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
• Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
• Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
• Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
• Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?

• What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?

• If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
• If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
• If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
• For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

See also

• Help:Starting editing

Good luck and happy editing. ```Buster Seven Talk 12:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Sooty655, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Sooty655! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Avro Vulcan XM655

The reason the citations need improving is because they need to be verifiable. I tried Googling "Cottesmore Operations Record Books TNA AIR28 series" or "Waddington Operations Record Books TNA AIR28 series", but no pages containing anything resembling those names showed up, and even after a search of the very few somewhat related results, the information was not locatable. This makes any reader entirely unable to verify what they are and where they came from. Normally, citations on Wikipedia do not consist entirely of a single, short line of plain words like those; they are generated using the Cite button and contain metadata, such as dates, links, ISBN numbers, etc. This is needed here. Also, you removed perfectly appropriate "Citations needed" tags. Content must be sourced on Wikipedia. Finally, you haven't yet, but remember not to go past the three-revert rule. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

As you will have seen, I have sorted out the TNA AIR 28 references so that the links now go directly to the results of the relevant search. The G-INFO search doesn't lend itself to the same approach, so I have put the necessary search term in a superscript note like a page number. Not ideal, but I couldn't find a better way. I'm not sure the TNA references should have The National Archive as the "publisher". They are the holder, who make the records available, but the originator, who decides when they are released to the public, is the Ministry of Defence. I don't know where the term "publisher" would fit in this arrangement. I'm not convinced that reference 2 is appropriate. The book appears to be simply a collection of lists, facts and pictures collected from a wide range of first- and second- hand sources, and it certainly contains inaccuracies. I am looking for the details of a more authoritative source, and will substitute it when found. Sooty655 (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)