December 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wema Sepetu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wema Sepetu was changed by Sony22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862036 on 2017-12-30T08:00:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Sony22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wema Sepetu

edit

I undid your edit to Wema Sepetu as it was unreferenced, or referenced by a blog which is not an acceptable source. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. To add a reference, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. There is a tool that can help: See wp:RefToolbar/2.0. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Please add references when you restore the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Michael. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Michael, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Foolish Age. Dan Koehl (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Muboshgu (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Michael. This is pursuant to your deletions of sourced material today and our discussion on my talk page. Largoplazo (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply