Sonalchuriwal

Welcome!

Hello, Sonalchuriwal, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

Overall, think this article is really strong and has a lot of evidence backing it up. It is incredibly well written in a neutral tone. Also, super easy to follow and understand. I think the way it is written, and its tone is incredibly strong. The definitions included in the article make the contents easily digestible and it is broken down into sections that make it easy to follow. I think your article could be improved by delving deeper into some of the ideas you briefly mention. In the section “Power as Zero-Sum and Campaign Tactics” you briefly mention that women aren’t encouraged to run for office and the political recruitment model. It would be stronger if you discussed this in a bit more detail. Also, in your conclusion you mention how women are put into this “double bind,” but do not explain what that means. I don’t think you should introduce this concept in a conclusion, but it could be discussed earlier in the article in order for it to make sense in the conclusion. I would say that your article is incredibly well-developed and just needs minor tweaks in order to become very successful.Danimo2021 (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Agentic power moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Agentic power, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)