Welcome edit

Hello, Soapsearcher, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

November 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jonny Craig have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soapsearcher (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not using this account to vandalize, so I was blocked from editing unjustly. Like I said, I have proof that backs up the edit I made, I can post this proof, which is going to be an imgur.com link. I tried telling you about this, so I went to your talk page, but instead you just blocked me. Soapsearcher (talk) 10:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

So you think that making this unreferenced edit was acceptable? What about the message you left on Boing! said Zebedee's user talk page stating that you have proof? You know, the same message where you box off at him about gender equality for no reason other than to try and push at him that this is about an issue that doesn't exist here? If you think that what you were acting acceptably, I will respectfully inform you that you are incorrect. Sorry, but your unblock request doesn't wash; it further pushes an issue that has nothing to do with the issue at hand and I don't buy it. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I only brought up transgenderism because it would help being open-minded about the issue I was about to raise. Even though we, as outsiders, cannot see it, doesn't mean it's automatically false. With that in mind, transracialism exists as well. That was the point I was trying to make. As per the person in questioning's wishes, here is the proof for the edit I made. He considers himself black, and is genuine in this, therefore I'm asking you to be open-minded about his transracialism, and not brush it off as something that doesn't exist, which is what a lot of people unfortunately do with transgenderism as well. (Note: Ext link removed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC))Reply