Smarticle07

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Will King. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Hojimachong^talk_con 02:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Exploding head has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 07:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you added to April 2, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. The article that you edited has notability guidelines for the addition of events to the list. Refer to WP:DOY for details on what are acceptable entries in Wikicalendar articles. Thank you. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 22:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Your unwillingness to have a two-way conversation on the topic of the Pope's death being included as an event indicates to me that your goal is only to be disruptive and that you have no respect for how Wikipedia works. If there is a disagreement, conversation takes place and we decide on how to proceed. I ask that you please engage in conversation on the topic at Talk:April 2. I have no doubt that your edits are in good faith but I hope that you will engage in dialog for the good of the project. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 22:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. B (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Smarticle07! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 757 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Lee Carter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Talmadge Lee Carter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talmadge Lee Carter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talmadge Lee Carter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lepricavark (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)