Speedy deletion nomination of MortaL - Naman Mathur edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MortaL - Naman Mathur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

old edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SkyVAC (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was Incorrectly accused of being a sock puppet of User:Adityarms just because I shared a name and created a Wikipedia page. But I put forward a firm statement that I have no resemblance with that user. Also the user had Multiple Sock puppet Cases with Different names. After further Investigation I got to know that there have been multiple sock puppet cases of User:Adityarms and the First block was in November 2019. Whereas my Account was Created in October 2019. I believe this is totally unfair due to unverified doubts of User:Praxidicae who blocked me and I believe, justice will be Served. SkyVAC (talk) 07:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Many sockpuppeteers put out firm statements of denial that they are sockpuppeting; statements of denial are insufficient for that reason. You will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the evidence might indicate that you are one(such as addressing what is described in the SPI. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:10, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you have a look, I have contributed edits to various pages such as Pokimane, Ninja (gamer), Shroud (gamer). All of these are centralised around the topic "Gaming" as they are streamers. And I none of field of interest in editing are similar to the field of interest of editing of the suspected users. You can also check the other sock puppets of same master here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adityarbs/Archive. One of it's sock Puppet is named 'Yukesh Chaudhary" whereas another seems to be from country Nepal. How can these all be connected with me? If you want, you can verify it with my Exact Real Identity which is

Name- "Aaditya Abhijeet Durugkar" Username- "SkyVAC" City- Pune, India Birth Date- 19 July 2001 Age- 18 Wikipedia Account Created- 25th October, 2019

If I was actually Guilty of this Sock Puppet, I would have never shared this personal information. So, this is all I State, If you need more evidence. Kindly be specific which evidence you want, I will surely mail photocopies of legal documents like School Certificate or Driving License.


SkyVAC (talk) 08:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Appeal Updated edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SkyVAC (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was Incorrectly accused of being a sock puppet of User:Adityarms just because I shared a name and created a Wikipedia page. But I put forward a firm statement that I have no resemblance with that user. Also the user had Multiple Sock puppet Cases with Different names. After further Investigation I got to know that there have been multiple sock puppet cases of User:Adityarms and the First block was in November 2019. Whereas my Account was Created in October 2019. I believe this is totally unfair due to unverified doubts of User:Praxidicae who blocked me and I believe, justice will be Served. If you have a look, I have contributed edits to various pages such as Pokimane, Ninja (gamer), Shroud (gamer). All of these are centralised around the topic "Gaming" as they are streamers. And I none of field of interest in editing are similar to the field of interest of editing of the suspected users. You can also check the other sock puppets of same master here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adityarbs/Archive. One of it's sock Puppet is named 'Yukesh Chaudhary" whereas another seems to be from country Nepal. How can these all be connected with me? If you want, you can verify it with my Exact Real Identity which is Name- "Aaditya Abhijeet Durugkar" Username- "SkyVAC" City- Pune, India Birth Date- 19 July 2001 Age- 18 Wikipedia Account Created- 25th October, 2019 So, this is all I State, If you need more evidence. Kindly be specific which evidence you want, I will surely mail photocopies of legal documents like School Certificate or Driving License.

Decline reason:

Ah ha ha. You must think we are idiots. Declined, talk page access revoked to prevent any further trolling. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 30981 edit

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30981 is now closed. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 13:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

Based on the Special:Permalink/962018445#SkyVAC_duck_block discussion on my talk page, I will be unblocking you, as I am reasonably convinced that you are not a sockpuppet of Adityarbs. I am, however, fairly sure that you have some kind of connection to MortaL, and I remind you that our conflict-of-interest rules require you to disclose a relationship if you have one (and our paid-contribution rules are even stricter about requiring disclosure). I also strongly encourage you to read our guidelines on promotion in articles even if you aren't connected, and if you continue promoting MortaL you will quickly earn yourself another block. Finally, we have a process for requesting unblock, and you went around that by canvassing on Discord to get someone else to look at it after your appeals were declined. That was inappropriate. Do not do that again. creffett (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please take Creffett's message to heart. I've gone out on a limb for you here, and I strongly recommend you take care that your edits do not appear promotional in the future. I highly recommend you not edit about MortaL at all, and focus on other streamers or video game related articles. -- ferret (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Updating stats edit

If you're going to update YouTube stats, like here, please also change the |stats_update= parameter to reflect the date you made the change. I fixed this for you here. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply