Sjm3

Sjm3, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sjm3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Economic Thought

The article Economic Thought has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

• A list of notable contributors was deleted with the explanation: remove unsourced name-dropping (needs *independent* sources discussing the importance of these people for the journal, not just tables of contents of the journal)). Providing a list of contributors is not name-dropping, it is relevant information that helps to establish notability. For another example of this use, see Revue économique.Sjm3 (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of World Economics Association

The article World Economics Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources. No indication of meeting WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

The material in your initial edit was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 18:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of World Economics Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Economics Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Economics Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Quantum economics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quantum economics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum economics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)