Sinucep

Thanks for the great graph

Great graph!!

Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the great graph you uploaded of the comparison between countries after the 100th case of COVID-19. This is exactly what I've been wondering and it's all there really nicely. Very helpful to have the doubles in a day / two days / three /week /month lines on the graph. Very informative. The fact that it goes from a fixed point in each country's epidemic (100th case) rather than fixed point in time is a stroke of brilliance. If you get the chance to post an updated version with more recent statistics I'd be interested to see it. Probably the single best CV19 graph I've seen. Thanks! Rafflesgluft (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome! The graph is from https://www.datawrapper.de/. I couldn't find exactly that graph (you can do it if you search enough) but there are a lot of other versions even with more data. Like: https://app.datawrapper.de/chart/kNbOh/visualize#refine-the-chart. --Sinucep (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vagility

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vagility requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.encyclopedia.com/earth-and-environment/ecology-and-environmentalism/environmental-studies/vagility. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick: Sorry for the inconvenience, I've changed the text, I think the banner can be removed now. --Sinucep (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Sinucep, OK, thanks. S Philbrick(Talk) 20:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Exoplanets discovered in 2021

A tag has been placed on Category:Exoplanets discovered in 2021 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Astronomical objects discovered in 2021

A tag has been placed on Category:Astronomical objects discovered in 2021 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Annotated links

Hello Sinucep - you have been adding annotated links to See also items, could you let me know how these have arisen they do nont seem to serve any purpose to me. Thanks --Iztwoz (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I've seen there is a tendency to add short descritipons to See also items and some users use the annotated link template. I think in some cases it is very useful. Sinucep (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks - but I have never seen this used and find it completely unnecessary - can you say what it achieves? I have undone the recent Flagellum edit. --Iztwoz (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, probably the Flagellum edit was superfluous. For example if you have acronyms or difficult to understand items in the See also section, the descriptions can save you time and add depth to the article. But I will wait to see what other users tell before changing other wikilinks. Sinucep (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

I cannot see that even adding descriptions to See also items needs this annotated link.? --Iztwoz (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

It is to avoid redundancy and to increase information centralization like wikidata has been doing for some time now! Sinucep (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Could you point out these earlier uses you referred to - as I said I have never seen their use in See also items and i have seen a great many! --Iztwoz (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Using {{Annotated link}}s is fine – they can add helpful detail to the links in the See also section. However, Short descriptions are intended to be short and so they are often too terse for a good See also link. In many cases, the Annotated link description should be treated as just a first draft and then improved with a hand-crafted description — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 16:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

@Iztwoz, here: Exoplanet#See_also, 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine#See_also

@GhostInTheMachine, yes, I fully agree and I will improve the defective descriptions. Sinucep (talk) 16:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Thank you for adding Short descriptions to articles. However, many of these descriptions have been too long – the current guidelines at WP:SDSHORT advise a limit of around 40 characters. Please read the full guidelines at WP:SDCONTENT — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 16:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I will read the guideline and edit "long short descritipons". Sinucep (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2023 Israel–Hamas war

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Israel–Hamas war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

I asked for help! Sinucep (talk) 11:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Fixed by User:GoingBatty. Sinucep (talk) 18:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)