License tagging for Image:CFF logo 2008.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:CFF logo 2008.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

edit

What you need to do is to say that you are releasing it into the public domain, according to the GFDL license." Be careful--this means anyone can copy reuse or modify the material even for commercial use. If you are not prepared to do this, rewrite the article entirely. DGG 20:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Simone Tomassini.

edit

What was the exact name of the article about Simone Tomassini that you say you created and when did you create it? The only records I can find of someone creating an article about him were both by Simonetta70. If you had created a third one under your name and it was deleted, there would be a notice here on your talk page and there isn't. I'm going to be frank with you, if you are editing under two or more accounts to avoid scrutiny of your edits, it doesn't look good. It's pretty obvious that you are affiliated in some way with Simone Tomassini. If you are doing any kind of public relations or digitial distribution work for him (either paid or as a volunteer), you have a serious conflict of interest and should not be editing articles about him at all. You should propose any additions to the article on Talk:Simone Tomassini and let uninvolved editors evaluate their appropriateness for addition. The same is true of Chinatown film festival, where I note, you have not followed the procedures for documenting permission to use the text from their website, as you had promised. An article that has proper permission to use copyright text will have an OTRS number displayed on the talk page. See Talk:Eugene Onegin (opera) for an example. Because of this, I'm not still sure you understand the problems about the images you have recently uploaded. You need to get help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. – Voceditenore (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gallery Records Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery Records Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. UtherSRG (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Gallery-records-200-wikipedia.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Gallery-records-200-wikipedia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chinatown film festival

edit
 

The article Chinatown film festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unsourced since 2009

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer (Talk) 06:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply