Shubhashree Sen

July 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Annette Comer, from its old location at User:Shubhashree Sen/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annette Comer (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Annette Comer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Annette Comer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Shubhashree Sen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 09:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 17:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shubhashree Sen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would request you to kindly unblock me. As you can see from my profile I am very new to Wikipedia and was not familiar with the policies and protocols. I am sorry for not clearly understanding the Wikipedia protocols before I submitted my first draft. I received $20 for all the research that I undertook for the work which was never published. I have also deleted the draft. I confirm that I have read and understood the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. In future if such topics come up I need to be aware of the Teahouse clause and disclose any payments that I might receive for the work. I would appreciate if you would kindly remove the block as it was my first attempt at creating a draft on Wikipedia without being fully aware of the clauses. Thank you. Shubhashree Sen (talk) 00:56, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The appeal does not contain the still-missing disclosure required by WP:PAID and the Terms of Service. It also seems that, even now, there is a lack of interest in editing about anything else. Furthermore, there are meatpuppetry concerns regarding Isingness, Draft:Annette Comer and Special:Permanentlink/969629799#Deleted Page that make an unblock pretty much impossible at this point. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.