Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Shittyboi024, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for A. Nesamony. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

hello

edit

this being your first edit makes one wonder that you have been here before. could you please disclose your previous account. --CarTick (talk) 02:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC) Came across the stuff from a networking site. A big issue was being made out of it. Great going guys! I support the views you expressed in different article discussions. This is my first time here. Want to be of some help in your tasks.Shittyboi024 (talk) 02:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

i dont understand. could you pls explain further. which discussion you are talking about and in which networking site you heard about it. --CarTick (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand too. Are you being the cop here? :) Get back to editing. Hope I haven't broken any of the wiki polices.Shittyboi024 (talk) 02:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

no, i am not and nobody here is. well, you said you heard about a discussion i was involved in in some networking site. why dont you then tell me where it was. i am just curious. i also find it pretty coincidental that a "new" editor i initiate a conversation with knows about me already. --CarTick (talk) 03:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

it was in orkut or fb i don't remember, calling for volunteers. i have only seen your edits. nothing more. so chill. discussion pages here interested me more than the articles and hence i somewhat remember the active posters.Shittyboi024 (talk) 03:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

thanks for telling me that. i am just curious. i believe it was a recruitment for Nair article? --CarTick (talk) 03:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

must have been. it is interesting anyway. Shittyboi024 (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

just one more thing. do you remember the name or the wp user name of the recruiter? --CarTick (talk) 03:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

i don't even remember the exact name of the thread/ community where the discussion was on. off topic, wouldn't revealing the name of the wp username lead to privacy concerns by that user, in case i remember? the profile name was more like a propagandist kind. Shittyboi024 (talk) 03:26, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

got you. you probably came across that while randomly browsing stuff on net. in any case, just out of curiosity, i would like to know what is your take on the whole issue? you keep saying you find it interesting. could u pls elaborate on that? --CarTick (talk) 03:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

hahahaha.. The fights that go one here, expulsions, blocks.. and the casteists and anti casteists like you.. i shouldn't be having a personal opinion, thanks to my journalist profession :) Shittyboi024 (talk) 03:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

if you are indeed a dispassionate and detached journalist, we would like to have you here as a regular editor. --CarTick (talk) 03:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your friendly note.Shittyboi024 (talk) 04:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Shittyboi024) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it can be construed as offensive (I'm referring to the "shitty" part). If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shittyboi024 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry. I didn't know the wikipedia naming policies. I request you to remove the block so that I could change my username, which I would do right away. Shittyboi024 (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You do not need to understand policies to know within your conscience that your username would be inappropriate for editing an encyclopedia of knowledge. As such, I have little faith in your desire/ability/maturity to provide positive additions to this project. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.