Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Shepherdonhydra. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Welcome! edit

Hi Shepherdonhydra! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center


Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi DoubleGrazing, I just wanted to ask if the references/sources that I did include were deemed acceptable? Is it only the parts of the text that haven't got verified sources that are the problem? Many thanks Shepherdonhydra (talk) 14:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi — as I said here, I didn't analyse the sources; I didn't get that far, because this failed on the lack of citations hurdle. I've had another look just now, and I'd say the sources are quite heavily biased towards primary ones, with only a couple of WP:RS secondary ones, which may or may not be enough to establish notability (I'd say not, but another reviewer might be more generous). Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naza Alakija (July 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Shepherdonhydra! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naza Alakija (July 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Naza Alakija edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Naza Alakija, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply