Shawis

Welcome...

Welcome!

Hello, Shawis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Bash Kash (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for the note, Actually, you caught me in the process of redoing all the links. The article needed to be done over almost completely and obviously ignored that other Eighteen Mile Creeks existed, including another only about fifty miles away.Stepp-Wulf (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC).

NFC Seahawks

Hi. Regarding your change to Jim Zorn, the Seattle Seahawks first season was indeed spent in the NFC. They moved to the AFC the very next season. Take a look at the Seattle Seahawks article as well as the final standings for 1976 (look at the NFC West). Now the next question I had was whether Zorn actually won a Rookie of the Year award that year. I have found little to back that up. I started a discussion thread at "Talk:Jim Zorn#NFC Offensive Rookie of the Year in 1976? Says who?" if you'd like to weigh in. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Lemur Street

Your edit summary stating that over half the references in Lemur Street is inaccurate. None of the references are "other Wikipedia articles." There are some references for episodes, which include embedded links to the episode list however it is the episode itself that is the reference, not a Wikipedia article. Those links to the episode list are part of the {{cite episode}} template. The episodes are perfectly acceptable references for something stated in the series. The links to the episode are not claims that the article is a reference, but a "more info" link. It is no different from wikifying the author name of a book reference, or the name of a journal or magazine. Collectonian (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The monument for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The monument is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The monument until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thryduulf (talk) 10:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)