Shambhallah
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shé D'Montford (November 16)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shé D'Montford.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TonyBallioni (talk) 02:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shé D'Montford, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shé D'Montford
edit
Hello Shambhallah. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shé D'Montford".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shé D'Montford}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Conflict of interest policy
edit
Hello, Shambhallah. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
|
March 2017
edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shamanism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "Dr. S. Montford" is not a reliable source. NeilN talk to me 19:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Why was the quote from the book I inserted removed
editI revised the citation as advised and updated it today, yet it was removed by another editor but no reason was given That same editor also removed an very innocuous update on another page to another article and has also removed citations without explanation I know my small contributions are well written, better researched ans cited than a lot of articles that appear on WP. I certainly hope this is not personal I want WP to be happy with my contributions If there is a problem Please Explain and I will fix it Shambhallah (talk) 03:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Shambhallah
- "Dr" Shé D'Montford appears to be a self-published author, self-declared psychic (ie, a charlatan), and a recognised expert in exactly nothing. As such, her book is not a reliable source. PepperBeast (talk) 07:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
How rude and biased of you - show you up to be a proponents of censorship at its finest - the book quoted from has been in continuous print for 10 years - many self published books are quoted on Wikipedia - sorry that you have an issue with me but that is your personal issue and has not place on a forum like this so leave my comment alone - especially when they are factual and neutral such as
“Shaman” is a word from the Tungus tribe in the alti-Himalayas who utilize drumming and meditation but oppose mind altering substances and is not to be confused with tribal “medicine men” of other traditions who take substances - how is that self serving - Wikipedia looks bad if it see as confusing such a BASIC point - Please do not touch any of my comments in the future - I will be lodging a discrimination complaint about you .
- Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia - any editor can edit any article. You cannot ask anyone to "not touch any of your comments". I have also removed your posting at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case as this is not the correct venue to lodge a complaint. Black Kite (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)