Welcome! edit

Hello, Shalivahan2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  —C.Fred (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mahabharata, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Karkota Empire. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Fixed typo" edit

Summarizing your edits as "Fixed typo" when you remove sourced info is misleading; please stop it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 17:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ror dynasty into List of Indian monarchs. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

As a general comment, leaving an edit summary of "fixed typo" is worse than nothing, because it's not what you did - you added content copied from another article. Please stop doing that.— Diannaa (talk) 12:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, you may be blocked from editing.
Alivardi (talk) 19:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 17:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of Indian monarchs has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Daniuu (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Magadha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You cannot keep adding large chunks of information to Wikipedia without a source. Wikipedia doesn't work that way. If you aren't sure how to use sources, there are some good links on the welcome message left at the top of this page, or just ask. Ravensfire (talk) 21:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Please explain why you continue to use "fixed typo" as an edit summary for edits that clearly aren't that. —C.Fred (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary sanctions notice edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 17:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of rulers of Malwa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RacoonyRE (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Hello, Shalivahan2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 19:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of rulers of Malwa. Again, stop adding large edits without a single source. You will be blocked if you continue. Ravensfire (talk) 14:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Do you even bother to read any of these warnings? Ravensfire (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Ravensfire he is using android app to edit it maybe because of the app he doesn't know that he is getting warnings he seems to be a enthusiastic hard working guy who makes Good Faith edits i think you should not bite him this hard 42.106.196.64 (talk) 12:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Malwa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vakpati. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 23 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Malwa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malavi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 30 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janapada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 7 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Rajasthan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avanti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copy-paste edit

Hi, please don't copy paste huge amounts of text from one article to another. Have a look at Wikipedia:Summary style. Also, as mentioned by another user above, #Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution. If you haven't gone through WP:TUTORIAL yet, please do so. utcursch | talk 22:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

utcursch He is using mobile app he probably doesn't gets notification that people are leaving messages on his talkpage

Disambiguation link notification for April 16 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ikshvaku dynasty kings in Hinduism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bala and Ardra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 23 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhimadeva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm TheBirdsShedTears. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to OpIndia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 9 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Jaisalmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Government Museum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hada Chauhan edit

Hi, I have reverted your edits in Hada Chauhan because you removed info without giving adequate explanation. Mainly this [1] edit, a simple "Fixed grammar" as edit summary isn't enough to justify deleting around half of a section. Justiyaya (talk) 11:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 16 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hadoti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rajgarh and Hada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 27 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Odisha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chitrangada, Odra and Sunanda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 3 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhim Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 10 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian monarchs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sarva and Munda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 17 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Rajasthan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanyaka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Afghanistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaya and Suka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabul Shahi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

  Your edit to Gaṇasaṅgha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – Pbrks (t • c) 03:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request) edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of dynasties and rulers Rajasthan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Diannaa thanks for advice. I added content from multiple articles to create a necessary page and I'm looking for better sources (like timelines) to add in future.
Thanks Saambha (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Since you copied material from other articles as well, you should retroactively add the required attribution. — Diannaa (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Shalivahan2. Thank you for your work on List of Vijayanagara emperors. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Shalivahan2. Thank you for your work on List of Gupta emperors. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply