Seyamar

Archives

• 1
• 2
• 3

DYK nomination of Svayamvara

Hello! Your submission of Svayamvara at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mrfoogles (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Dashavatara

Discussion is going on in talk page. Do join. Uriiix (talk) 06:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

I am new to wiki. Whatever constructive edit by me is rolled back by buddhist POV ppl. like Joshua Jonathan, Dasanudasa, etc,

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Avatar&oldid=1249120008#Dashavatara

Should buddhists decide what is Hinduism?

Balarama (debated), Buddha (debated) they write. It is denominational and not debated. I added with refs. 117.202.244.109 (talk) 02:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

BTW, could not add this Sat Vaishnava interpretation due to wordpress an by wiki:

"Bhudda as son of Jinana in the place called Gaya in the land of Magadha. This has been told in Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya Chapter 32 shloka 139.

Further, it has also been told that after completing 1000 years of Kaliyuga when all the devataas who were there in that yuga reached adobe and one who is killed by (destroyed by) Rudra by name Tripurasura was reborn in this world. At that time even Sri Vedavysa has disappeared and divine culture was existent by removing all faulty practices. At that time even demons had the opportunity to learn divine knowledge. But devataas and Paramathma did not like the idea of demons gaining divine knowledge. All devataas went to the ocean of milk where Sri Hari is residing and prayed him to bless them the solution for the above scene. During the same time in the place called Gaya (land of Magadha) Tripurasura was born to Shuddodana or Jinana. Paramathma disappeared the new born child and incarnated as a child. When Shuddodaka started doing ritual for the new born baby, the baby started smiling. They all stunned by the happening and the baby started preaching the new siddhanta called Bhudda sidhanta. Because of the prevailing situation ie divine culture they all did not believe the new philosophy, Paramathma remembered (called) his devataas and those devataas started launching different weapons on the new born baby. But that baby swallowed all the weapons like trishula etc and even when Vishnu attacked the baby with his discuss (chakra), even that the paramathma in the form baby made it as its seat and sat. On seeing the wonders of this child, Shuddodana and his followeres started believing and accepted the new philosophy by leaving divine culuture which they were following. After that the Paramathma disappeared from there and preached the real meaning of the new philosophy to the devataas, but demons were attracted by this new preaching and started following the same.

Even before this incident there is mention in Bhagavatha that Bhudda manifested earlier to attract Tripurasura’s wives.

The Bhudda who was born during 3000 AD is not the incarnation of Sri Narayana. Goutama Bhudda is one who has publicised the Bhudda philosophy which was preached by Sri Narayana as a child. It should be assumed that Goutama Bhudda is not the manifestation of Sri Narayana."

https://haridasa.wordpress.com/2012/06/06/dashavatara-stuti-sri-vadiraja-thirtha-stotra-with-english-translation/#:~:text=Bhudda%20as%20son%20of,manifestation%20of%20Sri%20Narayana. 117.202.244.109 (talk) 02:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

https://haridasa.wordpress.com/2012/06/06/dashavatara-stuti-sri-vadiraja-thirtha-stotra-with-english-translation/#:~:text=Bhudda%20as%20son%20of,manifestation%20of%20Sri%20Narayana

From this WP 117.202.244.109 (talk) 02:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bhima

added links pointing to Balinese, Chedi and Javanese

Prithvi

added a link pointing to Early Buddhism

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Madhavi (princess)

I have reviewed your DYK nomination for Madhavi (princess). It looks otherwise OK but Earwig's Copyvio Detector scored 49.0% for the URL sacred-texts.com/hin/m05/m05120.htm. JIP | Talk 13:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chedi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Madhavi (princess)

On 2 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Madhavi (princess), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Hindu mythology, Madhavi, who was blessed with the miraculous ability to regain her virginity after each childbirth, was married to three kings, each in exchange for 200 rare horses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Madhavi (princess). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Madhavi (princess)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaushiki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Shiva image

This image more closely matches the traditional iconography of Shiva as stated in the body (e.g. Ganges in head, bearded as usual depicted Adi Yogi and Shiva linga, posture)

@Seyamar Can you get consensus and add this image to God Shiva. Varsh Singh swamy (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

@Varsh Singh swamy, don't come to me for your agenda, I have already told you I am not interested in it. Don't ever disturb me on my talk page. Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 14:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Draupadi

Your edit on Draupadi page gives an impression that you are not a scientific thinker Riteze (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

@Riteze Sorry but Wikipedia doesn't work on your eo called "Scientific" Original Research. Familiarise that information of articles such as Draupadi are based on secondary reliable sources, not anyone's "scientific" views. Kindly get introduced to various policies.Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 19:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

This is not any kind of research but application of one of the universal laws of nature that is, law of conservation of mass. Where the articles are based on the secondary reliable sources, the source should be cited in the portion you are editing. I already know a lot of policies of this portal, including the above mentioned one (citing reliable sources along with the content). If citing any reliable sources is not possible, it should at least not violate the any universal law of nature. Riteze (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

What is so dumb in this stuff?

Draupadi's last edit. Even if they are mythological narratives, shouldn't they be cited properly (as per Wikipedia's policy)?Riteze (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

@Riteze Please read WP:Citing Sources, WP:RS, WP: Mythology citations are made to support the statement in the paragraph. Usually citations are reliable secondary sources, which can be books, academic papers, proper websites.

I think you have mistaken that citations should be something which must prove something is in ddherence to science. No they are not, Draupadi is a mythological character whose story may/may not originated from an actual figure. In such mythological articles, citations are provided from assessments of myth made by scholars to prove that narrative wise, it is true. Its quite obvious most myths are scientifically not possible, dragging "law of conservation of mass", etc. into myths is amusing and dumb. Regards, Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 14:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Please look carefully. The content under consideration did not have any citations or sources marked. That's why, citation was asked for, which is a basic requirement of Wikipedia. Riteze (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Reference for that statement is provided in "Mahabharata with the Commentary of Nilakantha". June 2013. Retrieved 2015-07-24. Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 15:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

But what was that it "violates law of conservation of mass" ? Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 17:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The length of a fabric can't get increased automatically of its own. Riteze (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

@Riteze that's the point, u cannot apply science in mythological narratives! Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 19:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

But, don't such things make the Mahabharata appear to be a fake or just an imaginary story? Riteze (talk) 19:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

That's what mythology is, it may/may not be based on some historical events in the past but due to 1000s of years of passing down from one generation to next, divine elements might have been added to the stories to enrich it. But no one is sure for that. What matters is that how these stories are in their present form and how they provide a morale compass and the various symbolisms they stand for. Treat them as ancient stories which were written to guide people, not historical records. If you want to treat them as history, its totally upto you, but don't change what the narratives are, Ramayana clearly mentions that Hanuman flew over the oceanSeyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 20:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Current content of Draupadi tarnishes the image of Krishna that he didn't have the guts or ability to stop the process of Cheer haran, due to which he helped draupadi in a hidden manner. The link ("Mahabharata with the Commentary of Nilakantha". June 2013. Retrieved 2015-07-24.) as mentioned in the above posts is not working.

I am really interested to see the verifiable source/citation which says Hanuman flew, because as far as I know, it said that Hanuman ne samudra laangha, but it didn't mention ud kar, kood kar ya tair kar. By common sense, tair kar hi laangha hoga. Riteze (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

You want to prove that Krishna was a coward?

Your last edit in Draupadi. Riteze (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamadeva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Svayamvara

Hello! Your submission of Svayamvara at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

@BlueMoonsetYeah I will finish that by next week Seyamar_(245CMR)^💬📜 04:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)