Sdhshjsahsa

Welcome

Hello, Sdhshjsahsa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

November 2016

Hello, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Double sharp have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cahk (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to this, you may be blocked from editing. -glove- (talk) 08:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Cahk (talk) 08:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Double sharp. -glove- (talk) 08:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

How very original of you. You do have better things to do with your time, don't you? Double sharp (talk) 08:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdhshjsahsa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me Sdhshjsahsa (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block. I was about to revoke your ability to edit this page as it is clear that you are here only to cause disruption, but I saw that had already been done. If you genuinely have a case for unblock, please see WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Forgive me if I do not find that likely. I do believe you likely blew it when you decided to escalate our little disagreement from a civilised discussion to your very original tactics. Why don't you use this time to increase your level of maturity, instead of throwing this sort of tantrum whenever you don't get your way? Double sharp (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/88.109.192.184, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-glove- (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.