Welcome!

Hello, Scythian1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Aplomado talk 00:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mormonism and Islam edit

Don't know if you saw my response to your recent message on my talk page, but I just wanted to be sure. Thanks for bringing that to my attention (about the tobacco issue), and thanks for your compliments! Salam! - Ecjmartin (talk) 13:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ghilzai edit

Please see Talk:Khalji --Vssun (talk) 02:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive edits edit

You're not adhering to Neutral point of view, for example;

- Providing 1 source that describes Christian adherents, and then a different reference for muslim adherent numbers. [1]. Why would you provide different sources for different religions in the same paragraph?

  • You engage in vandalism here [2] without explanation in the edit summary
  • More vandalism;

- Here [3] where you remove a properly cited and reliable source, with an older source.

- Here you again replaced a citation from 2010 [4] with a citation from 2009. Why would you replace newer sources with older ones?

Please be more mindful with your edits next time. Thanks.Someone65 (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, I strongly recommend you to carefully read Wikipedia:Vandalism#How_not_to_respond_to_vandalism. With that said, the first purported "vandalism" [[5] involved something with absolutely no citation or specific reference. Secondly, the other alleged "vandalism" involves the providing of sources which were gathered in 2009 while the other was from a recently conducted national consensus. Is there any indication that the alleged "2010" source you noted actually gathered its information about in 2010? Thanks. Scythian1 (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dal Khor for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dal Khor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dal Khor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mongol Muslims edit

Category:Mongol Muslims, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply