Disclosure

edit
 This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Draft:Dan Reisner.
 This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Bodo Sieber.




Welcome!

edit

Hello, Schmosbyss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Bodo Sieber does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  JSFarman (talk) 16:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Don't abuse Wikipedia for marketing

edit

Stop adding such links. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. That won't happen again. Schmosbyss (talk) 16:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bmjc98 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bmjc98. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Reisner (October 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus (petri dish) 15:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Schmosbyss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus (petri dish) 15:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply