Savetheworld7

Savetheworld7, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Savetheworld7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
7		Frank Herbert Mason (talk)	Add sources
798		Royal Library of the Netherlands (talk)	Add sources
96		Kay Nielsen (talk)	Add sources
57		School bus by country (talk)	Add sources
31		Belay Zeleke (talk)	Add sources
55		Classical Realism (talk)	Add sources
5		Mathias Alten (talk)	Cleanup
6		Torleif S. Knaphus (talk)	Cleanup
3		Harold Frank (talk)	Cleanup
20		Musée Toulouse-Lautrec (talk)	Expand
8		Pays des Impressionnistes (talk)	Expand
27		Alice and Martin Provensen (talk)	Expand
14		Kenneth Paul Block (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Decorative Impressionism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10		James Avati (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
450		Money order (talk)	Merge
18		Marjata (talk)	Merge
752		Blacksmith (talk)	Merge
20		Frank Schoonover (talk)	Wikify
29		Wind of 120 days (talk)	Wikify
11		Anna Huntington Stanley (talk)	Wikify
14		Wah Bhudi (talk)	Orphan
58		Contemporary-Traditional Art (talk)	Orphan
8		Mary Whyte (talk)	Orphan
3		George Passantino (talk)	Stub
21		Peter de Sève (talk)	Stub
12		Guy Billout (talk)	Stub
5		Harry Leith-Ross (talk)	Stub
5		Richard Jack (talk)	Stub
13		C. F. Payne (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello Savetheworld7. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Savetheworld7. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Savetheworld7|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 02:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosabella (fashion brand) (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GSS were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cosabella (fashion brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cosabella (fashion brand), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 03:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)