SarahSamuell

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WaddlesJP13 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, SarahSamuell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) (December 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted without any meaningful improvement. Given that, and the lack of evidence of notability even after multiple declines, I can only conclude that better sources are not available, and the subject is therefore not notable enough to justify inclusion. To avoid further reviewer time being expended on this, I am now rejecting than merely declining this draft.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing i left a resource talking about the students demonstration in 2015 , and the topic about this school has no sites on google unless its for the regulat information like grades and money to pay ... so i created this page as a primary resource to search for this school, why is it rejected completely? SarahSamuell (talk) 09:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Because Wikipedia summarises what other, independent and reliable sources have previously published; we are never the first source to publish anything. If such other sources don't exist, then they cannot be summarised, and therefore no Wikipedia article can be published on the subject. This is what we call 'notability', and it is a core requirement for inclusion in the encyclopaedia. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing fine i get it , i put a reference from youtube , which talks about what i wrote about this school.. the video is made by the students of the school and i also put a reference about the demonstation occured in 2015 by the students also... these are the only refrences i got , what else should i add from your point of view, sir? SarahSamuell (talk) 11:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

If the video is made by the students of this school, then it is clearly not independent (and may or may not be reliable); it is also a primary source, which does not establish notability.

If the other piece is about the demonstration, it has the additional problem that it's not actually about the school as such, it's about something that happened at the school.

You really need to read and understand the WP:ORG notability guideline, and make sure that you find multiple (3+) sources that meet every aspect of it. If, as you seem to suggest, such sources aren't available, then it isn't possible to publish this article. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing what should i do to make a riable reference?? SarahSamuell (talk) 12:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The concept of reliable sources is explained at WP:RS. We're looking for reputable secondary sources (newspapers, TV broadcasters, etc.) that have editorial controls in place and employ fact-checking. In other words, someone doesn't just write whatever they want; they write based on proper research (itself based on reliable sources, which are checked and cross-checked), then get their fact-checkers to make sure it all holds water, and then get their editor to approve it for publication. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

i hope you understand my point , the history of the school has not been published on the social media before , the video reference i put inside the article is the actual story made by the school. we do not have any sources talking about our school history unless its about its old place or the old classes. SarahSamuell (talk) 13:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart School ( Alexandria ) (December 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Just wasting our time

KylieTastic (talk) 11:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)