Welcome! edit


Welcome!

Hello, San anjelo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they are appreciated. I hope you like it here, and decide to stay. Here a few pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask at the help desk, leave me a message on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  · AndonicO Talk

Atlag United Methodist Church edit

Since you removed the speedy deletion tag from Atlag United Methodist Church, I've nominated it for deletion via the WP:AFD process. Removal of an AFD tag is considered vandalism, so please don't do that. An anonymous editor has already deleted it once, and has been reverted. When I took my first look at what you had done to the article, I couldn't believe my eyes. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web provider, you made the article look like the church's personal website, which is not what we're here for. If you can provide reliable sources as to the church's notability, what makes it unique from all other churches, then please provide them. The AfD discussion will run five days. Corvus cornixtalk 23:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Atlag United Methodist Church edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Atlag United Methodist Church. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Tiggerjay (talk) 23:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Atlag United Methodist Church/AtlagUMC Information edit

Template:Atlag United Methodist Church/AtlagUMC Information has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Corvus cornixtalk 23:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Template:AtlagUMC/box-header edit

 

A tag has been placed on Template:AtlagUMC/box-header, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornixtalk 23:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:AtlagUMC/box-footer edit

A tag has been placed on Template:AtlagUMC/box-footer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornixtalk 23:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Atlag United Methodist Church edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Atlag United Methodist Church, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlag United Methodist Church. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tiggerjay (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Little context in Template:Atlag United Methodist Church/AtlagUMC References edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Atlag United Methodist Church/AtlagUMC References, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Atlag United Methodist Church/AtlagUMC References is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Atlag United Methodist Church/AtlagUMC References, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/San anjelo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Tiggerjay (talk) 23:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing and logging out to avoid WP:3RR. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GBT/C 20:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aurora Soriano Cudal edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aurora Soriano Cudal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.aurorascudal.name/whos_aurora/family_background.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aurora Soriano Cudal edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aurora Soriano Cudal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.aurorascudal.name/whos_aurora/family_background.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Bulacan Capitol Park.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bulacan Capitol Park.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 18:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Wesleyan Unviersity - Philippines edit

 

A tag has been placed on Wesleyan Unviersity - Philippines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 12:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Wesleyan Unviersity - Philippines . For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Consider this you last warning--Tikiwont (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Bulacan State University/BULSU Accredited Programs edit

Template:Bulacan State University/BULSU Accredited Programs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Tikiwont (talk) 13:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation of Bulacan photos edit

I see that you have copied to Wikipedia many photos from the official Bulacan website. This is not allowed. -seav (talk) 07:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of a fortnight in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly uploading blatant copyright violations after deliberately modifying them to hide the fact they weren't yours. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hersfold (t/a/c) 13:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know you've been warned about using copyrighted sources before, because I did it myself. Deliberately hiding the fact that something is copyrighted is malicious and illegal. Wikipedia is a free site, and we cannot permit copyrighted images to be used without a detailed and valid fair use statement, which you images would not have qualified for. Please read WP:COPY and the previous link for more information, and make sure you have a full understanding of these policies before you attempt to upload any further images. Hersfold (t/a/c) 13:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Nccp.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Nccp.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Glenn Bautista edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Glenn Bautista, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.yessy.com/glennbautista/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Glenn Bautista and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Glenn Bautista with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Glenn Bautista.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Glenn Bautista/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Glenn Bautista saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Bulacan_state_university_new_logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bulacan_state_university_new_logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Project FMF (talk) 23:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Atlag United Methodist Church.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Atlag United Methodist Church.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bulacan sanmiguel biaknabato.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bulacan sanmiguel biaknabato.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Bulacan walk of fame.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bulacan walk of fame.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/jepipoy/2832190816/. As a copyright violation, Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Malolos cathedral interior.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. seav (talk) 17:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/d2digital/301523819/in/set-72157594383650224/. As a copyright violation, Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Barasoain interior2.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. seav (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/d2digital/301542852/in/set-72157594383650224/. As a copyright violation, Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Barasoain belltower cross.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. seav (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/d2digital/301515048/in/set-72157594383650224/. As a copyright violation, Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Barasoain ceiling.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. seav (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Image:Barasoain interior.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Barasoain interior.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/d2digital/301509550/. As a copyright violation, Image:Barasoain interior.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Barasoain interior.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain interior.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Barasoain interior.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Barasoain interior.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. seav (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please stop uploading photos edit

Please stop uploading photos that you did not take. You cannot upload photos taken by other people into Wikipedia without their permission. --seav (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Singkaban.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Singkaban.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Malolos_casa_real.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Malolos_casa_real.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Bulacan Aerial View.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bulacan Aerial View.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. RunningOnBrains(talk) 03:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Final warning edit

 

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a copyrighted image claiming it to be made by yourself, as you did with File:Malolosmap.gif, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 03:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bulacan Philippines Annual Conference edit

 

The article Bulacan Philippines Annual Conference has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply