September 2022 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Udai Singh II have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Banvir. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 08:05, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom of Mewar, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Extorc.talk 08:06, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jagmal Singh, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Extorc.talk 08:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Udai Singh II. >>> Extorc.talk 08:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Banvir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. >>> Extorc.talk 08:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shut khajput Sahil chamain (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Vikramaditya Singh (Maharana), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. >>> Extorc.talk 08:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mujhe pta h tum sb khajput ho. Lkin tum chaite kya ho.sach ko koi bhi hra nhi paya tu to fir bhi khajput ho Sahil chamain (talk) 08:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Udai Singh II, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I guess these warnings are just formality untill you get blocked by an Admin. >>> Extorc.talk 08:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes u r right Sahil chamain (talk) 08:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Jitni baar block kroge itni hi nyi I'd aayegi Sahil chamain (talk) 08:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Interesting.. >>> Extorc.talk 08:45, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SpencerT•C 08:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Spencer can u unblock me Sahil chamain (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Why you unblock me without any reason. You are using your power wrongly Sahil chamain (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why you blocked me Sahil chamain (talk) 18:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why you blocked me Sahil chamain (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Without any valid reason you blocked me Sahil chamain (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
you are using your power wrongly Sahil chamain (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock me edit

Why you blocked me without any reason Sahil chamain (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sahil chamain (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not done anythingSahil chamain (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me edit

I realise my mistake. I will not do again on Wikipedia. Unblock me Sahil chamain (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You'll need to be more specific about what you did wrong, how you'll avoid doing it in the future, and give a specific example of a constructive edit, including the reliable source(s) you'll use to support it, that you'd make if you were to be unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I will assure you that after every information I will be provided a source or website linking the truth. Sahil chamain (talk) 04:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
C.Fred Sahil chamain (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply