User talk:SJP/Archive 8

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Lsi john in topic Medcab

Thank you edit

Dear Sir, Thank you for your comments at my RfA. Let me know if I can help you and feel free to let me know if I mess up anywhere. Cheers. Shyamal 03:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Activity edit

I've been ill for the last week or so, that's why I've not been here. I'm not going to be active until early August though; I'm leaving on Friday, and may not have much time to edit. :( · AndonicO Talk 08:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. :) · AndonicO Talk 11:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Thanks for the smile no one has ever smiled on here at me before! I return with the WikiLove!--Migospia 09:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Ahh, thank you.... for your kindess and taking the time to leave this message and being so kind I award you this barnstar

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I, The Sunshine Man award you Sir james paul this Barnstar for the time and effort you put into Wikipedia and being a really good and kind editor. Happy editing --The Sunshine Man 12:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ck lostsword's RfA - Thanks edit

  Thanks very much for your support in my recent RfA, which passed successfully at 40/2/1, making me Wikipedia's 1,250th administrator. Your comments were much appreciated, and I will endeavour to fulfil your expectations as an admin.


ck lostsword T C

File:Ck lostsword copy.png

ck lostsword T C 17:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Confusion edit

You left me a message, in which you said that I am vandalising wikipedia and you said that I also vadalised Abdul Ali Mazari artical.Listen I never visited that Abdul Ali Mazari artical before and never edited or changed any word from it! Don not do this kind of warning again!

Yes you did edit the Bdul Ali Mazari article. For evidence take a look at this.--†Sir James Paul† 19:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar edit

Hey, thanks so much for the barnstar you awarded me for anti-vandalism, I very much appreciate your generosity! I'll keep up the good work! The Rambling Man 20:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

You recent comments! edit

What are you saying? I did not do anything wrong to the Days of our Lives article! Please remove your comment.71.246.123.180 23:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Being this is a good faith edit, there is no need for your rudeness.

my RFA edit

Thank you for supporting my RFA. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 23:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

sorry edit

i do not understand how is is not good what is wrong with it

No, my edit was not vandalism. It is my talk page and I don't need a pointless message saying "Welcome to Wikipedia" when I've been using Wikipedia for nearly 3 years now. So if I want to blank my own talk page, it is of no consequence to you. Stop reverting it.

hey...what? edit

the first time i edited dwyane wade's article, i had a typo, and it made it an external link, which someone undid.

i realized it a minute later, and fixed it. it had been pointing to his favorite movie as the page "boomerang" -- about the wooden tool. i changed it to point to boomerang_(film), which has since been changed back.

i don't see why it was changed back, as i did improve the article, fixing a broken link.

alright, thanks.


UPDATE Ironically, my post was just vandalized. :)

I would appreciate an answer! edit

Please respond to my comments regarding the use of Liberation versus Invasion regarding Iraq. Just a summary of what my point is :

Words have meaning. Words the MSM uses that are demeaning

and discouraging and what should replace them are:

Wrong "Invasion" - Correct " liberation" (Remember the Public Law 105-338 the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. It wasn't called the Iraq Invasion Act!) Wrong "invaders" - Correct "liberators" Wrong: Insurgents - Correct " thugs", Wrong "freedom fighters" - Correct "barbarians". Your totally biased use of negative terms like above certainly shows you talk the talk but you definitely don't walk the talk! Send me your responsed to kayremember@yahoo.com

Sir, that is your POV and there is no room for peoples POV at wikipedia. We are an encyclopedia, not a blog. If you believe that the words should be changed to what you want them to say, bring it up on the talk page. If they agree with you, then it can be changed, if they do not, then it can not be changed. Have a nice week and God bless:). --†Sir James Paul† 02:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blanking one's talk page isn't vandalism edit

As you indicated here. Discussion page vandalism is is one type of vandalism, but a user's own talk page is specifically excluded from that definition.--Chaser - T 07:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smile right back at you! edit

God bless! Yours sincerely, Eddie 16:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

RuneWiki777 18:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the smiley.

Smile edit

Thank you. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 23:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool, thanks!!! edit

Hey buddy, I appreciate it! Always nice to see someone approving of my work lol. Happy editing! Jmlk17 05:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you... edit

...for your kind words and support at my RFA. I also really like the quote at the top of this page - my feeling exactly!--Kubigula (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fred_Thompson edit

There is an edit war going on at Fred_Thompson. I have added some information sourced to a major newspaper but Thompson's supporters seem determined to keep it out. I don't know what's the right course of action usually taken under these circumstances but a page lock with the information in might be a good idea. --JGoldwater 18:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

First of all, do not edit war. Edit warring does not help, it only causes stress. I have made that mistake before, so I know it does not help. I have not looked at the nature of your edits to the Fred Thompson article but policy says that bio's of living people says that article must be sourced with reliable, verifiable resources, must be NPOV, and must not have original research. If your edits do not meet all of these things, then it can not be in the article. To verify what I said, you can take a look at WP:BLP. I hope I helped. Have a nice week and God bless:)--†Sir James Paul† 02:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the Smile edit

Thank you for the smile. It made me smile. :) Captain panda 02:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Leviathan edit

I moved the Leviathan section in Judaism to Leviathan in rabbinic literature

For your hard work edit

  The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For tireless efforts to keep the wiki in shipshape! Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 02:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for the barstar. Oysterguitarist~Talk 02:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

  for the smile! It made me feel better! --Hdt83 Chat 05:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome edit

Cheers! --Fire Star 火星 05:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Another barnstar for your hard work edit

I, Andrij Kursetsky, hereby grant you this Cools as a cucumber barnstar. Stay as cool as you are. Thanks for fighting vandalism in Wikipedia – you make a great work.   Andrij Kursetsky 09:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

ethnobiology article edit

it's redundant--why keep the second half?

Amount of time that I have been editing edit

I have been editing since November, but I never made a good deal of edits until January. Captain panda 01:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

A special barnstar for you! edit

  The Special Barnstar
One of the best editors on en.wiki deserves another barnstar. --trey 02:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do leave me out of it. edit

I have nothing to do with the nonsense at Shoeless Joe Jackson. Please do leave me out of it. Smallbones 09:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shoeless Joe Jackson edit

You're giving orders to God? That's fairly brassy. Anyway, the issue with that article is over Tecmobowl's personal link whose purpose is to sell baseball cards. He and others want it to stay, I and others don't think it belongs. I don't know what else to say about it. Baseball Bugs 09:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Worse in what way? It always comes back to what he wants, and the rest of us be damned. Baseball Bugs 08:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
You're right. Do I have your permission to delete your followup to my comment, as part of deleting my comment? Or, you may do it yourself, if you want. Baseball Bugs 09:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
No, I mean on the Shoeless Joe Jackson talk page. Tecmo has been sulking since the admins slapped down his request for "arbitration" against the admin Irishguy, so maybe I could zap my needlessly inflammatory comments (and the responses) before he decides to get back on. I know he won't be happy in any case, since an IP address reverted him on his pet article Tecmo Super Bowl, which is where he gets his user ID from, I presume. Please note that, the opposite of Tecmo, I never delete comments from my own talk page, other than outright vandalism (which is rare), until I do an archive, as per the guidelines. (Speaking of which, I just did an archive, as the page was getting lengthy) That also saves me from having to write essays explaining my behavior, as Tecmo did recently on his own talk page. Baseball Bugs 09:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Done. I let Mondegreen's comments stand, as it's her place to delete them, or not. And now I'll take the page off my watch list again. (It auto-updates the "watch" flag when I do an update.) Baseball Bugs 09:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

another thank you edit

You seem to have alot of "thank you" notes here. Well, here's another one. Thanks for reverting my Talk Page. Jru Gordon 09:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Medcab edit

Thank you for letting me know. Actually I was not aware that I was involved in a Medcab request for that article. It appears someone has signed me up for it without letting me know. Lsi john 11:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the article from my watchlist. It's obvious to me that there will be no compromise and hence no resolution. I was unaware that a mediation had been requested and 'one' single link is certainly not worth the time and energy that has been spent on it. I felt (and still do) that the link is reasonable and adds value to the article, but I've never been interested in 'fighting' to keep it in the article. There are simply much better things to do with our time.
I appreciate your efforts and hope that we meet again under other conditions. Best Regards. Peace.Lsi john 13:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you X 100 edit

 
Thank you very much for supporting my RfA, which closed successfully yesterday... W00t! I hope to be a great admin (and editor) and I'm sure you can tell that my use of a large, boldfaced, capital "T" and a big checkmark image in this generic "thank you" template that I swiped from some other user's Talk Page that I totally mean business! If you need anything in the future or if you see that I've done something incorrectly, please come to my Talk Page and let me know. So now I've got a bunch of reading to do.... see you around! - eo 13:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shoeless Joe Jackson Article edit

The main dispute is over the inclusion of a particular external link. There is a pretty good summary of my thoughts on that page. If you have any other questions, just lmk. //Tecmobowl 18:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barkiing Spider edit

The Barking spider article cites, very unreliable sources, for one, secondly it is more commonly know as the whistling spider, and the sound that it produces is nothing at all like a fltulence—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.79.237.28 (talkcontribs)

Rotting9 edit

I am not allowed to blank my own talk page? Rotting9


I blanked my "talk" page, Rotting9 and you reverted it

My redirect edit

That pages should have never been recreated Talk:Kitty Pryde#Ultimate Shadowcat

Thanks edit

I've just added the Twinkle anti-vandal tool which makes it very easy now for reverting.--JForget 00:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you :) edit

Your highness, thanks for the Barnstar. I see you too as one hard ass anti vandal :-D I think you do hunting by TWINKLing the Recent changes :-) How about adding User:Lupin/Anti-vandal tool to your monobook.js file? Then you can revert at least five vandalism per minute. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 06:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

User page edit

Thanks for responding. If it is my own talk page (communication between me and someone else), I don't understand why it's rude to remove it... as the issue at hand had been covered and rectified. For me personally; I find it quite confusing being there. When I logon and see I have new messages I want to be able to see those before anything else, instead of the small talk I had with somebody two weeks ago. Especially talk that I will likely never need to re-read again in the future, as I understand what the other user was trying to explain to me. Rotting9

Twinkle edit

Hi! I saw you're using Twinkle. I wanted to too, so I pasted that js-stuff in my monobook.js, but I cant see any difference!! How do I revert edits and warn users using it?? I have Firefox. — H92 (t · c · no) 22:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much! But how do I get started using it? — H92 (t · c · no) 22:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
NM, I found out. Is it possible to edit the automatic edit summary? How do i disable the function that puts all the articles i reverted into my watchlist?! — H92 (t · c · no) 22:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

editing Dan Fox edit

Hi, I have been trying to edit my page on here since someone in my former band has left me slander and racist remarks. it is in the last paragraph please get back to me I would like my whole page taking down asap! thank you

Re: Barnstar edit

Thank you very much for that - its nice to know one is appreciated - most of the feedback I get for carrying out admin tasks is less pleasant. For example, I am apparently an Orwellian liar according to this charming editor (he put a similar sentiment less politely in a email he sent me) :-).

I missed your RfA the other day - sorry about the outcome of that (you seem to have had quite a rough ride). I hope you're not too disheartened and might give it another go sometime in the future. Some of our best admins didn't pass they RfAs the first time. What I've seen of your editing here has been first-rate but I guess we all need to be careful when editing about topics we feel strongly about. Hopefully next time it'll work out for you. Best wishes, WjBscribe 04:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar edit

  The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You've beaten me four times today on Vandal-Patrol, and in recognition of your fantastic service to Wikipedia, I award you this amazing barnstar. Well done, and keep up the good work! Lradrama 09:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for the wiki-love message. You have a lovely week too. Happy editing, with regards, Lradrama 09:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smile thanks edit

Thanks for the smile! :D Sorry if I was late to reply... TomasBat 15:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

User:Bahumut is harrasing me and i have to go somewhere soon can you help me?OysterGuitarst 00:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I just don't want him to get away with anything while i'm gone. OysterGuitarst 00:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for helping me out with that user. There indefinatly blocked so they won't be a problem anymore. cheers OysterGuitarst 03:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am Korean Canadian. If you Google the term uriginal and you will find the term is only being used (really being promoted) on Wikipedia and Urban Dictionary. Also, I find the term offensive because it is racist. I would like the whole article to be scrapped. Cheers,

Joseph Lee

Today... edit

...started with the usual contentiousness with Tecmobowl, and accelerated into a 1-week suspension for him, thanks to 3RR violations along with solid evidence that he had used a sockpuppet to evade a block a couple of weeks ago. I want to apologize to you for being kind of cross with you this morning. That guy has really been on my nerves, as well as on the nerves of others. You have no idea what we've been putting up with, from that character. I always hold out the hope that someone will see reason and improve their behavior on their own. But some folks are just too thick-header or egoistic for redemption. Hopefully I myself am not that far gone. Be good. :) Baseball Bugs 22:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your support and comments at my RfA
Hi Sir james paul, It still amazes me that otherwise "anonymous" editors take the time to place !votes and comments on RfAs. Whilst I would have normally thanked you at the time of you leaving your message, the importance of my not appearing to be canvassing prevented me from so doing. Now that everything has progressed successfully I can finally thank you. I intend to uphold a style of good adminship and will welcome your further comments at any time in the future, even if they are in the form of admonishment. I will be happy to help as an admin wherever and whenever I can --VS talk 23:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

Thanks for the smile - it's much needed (the thermometer has dropped through the floor here and I don't like the cold!) BTW, I've been meaning to ask - is your username a McCartney reference? Grutness...wha? 09:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, we share one thing in common then (I'm a James Robert :) Grutness...wha? 09:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop stalking me! edit

Where I ever I revert, you seem to be there, please explain your actions, otherwise I will take arbitory action against you. Meateater 12:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can I have some links to where I have reverted your edits? Thanks.--†Sir James Paul† 12:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
It was a joking reference, nothing serious! LOL. Meateater 12:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Odd edit history here. Peace.Lsi john 12:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the smile edit

Thanks for the smile. :-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 19:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

RfA thanks edit

 

Hi SJP. Thank you for your support and kind words in my RfA, which passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of caretaker assistance.

Jreferee (Talk) 07:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
 

Vandalism edit

You're too quick with the guns Sir. I cannot match you yet! Everywhere I turn to revert vandalism, your work has already been done. Well done. ΞΞΞ 00:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

EndUN Userbox edit

Hi, you recently participated in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DieWeisseRose/Userboxes/EndUN discussion. I have reluctantly submitted the closing statement by User:Tony Sidaway for deletion review. Please consider taking a look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_1#User:DieWeisseRose.2FUserboxes.2FEndUN. Thanks. --DieWeisseRose 02:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

My RfA edit

Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smile! edit

My recent RfB edit

Thank you so much for your participation in my recent RfB. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community.

I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at User:EVula/admin/RfB notes. Thanks again! EVula // talk // // 04:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks... edit

...for the barnstar! I noted you were racing me too. Good to have people like you around! -Kukini hablame aqui 19:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

smile edit

I like to smile at people on the wiki all the time. Thanks. Francisco Tevez 20:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

My RFA edit

Hi Sir james paul, just a quick note to say thanks for participating in my request for adminship. It was successful and I now have some shiny new buttons. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Happy editing, mattbr 09:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :) edit

 
Thank you so much,
my dear Sir James! :)
That was so incredibly sweet, dear Sir James - thank you! :) May this little flower seal a newborn, everlasting friendship! :) Love, Phaedriel - 16:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Error in correcting me edit

Hi, refering to the message you let me about a recent edit on Dundee United FC - i have never even visited this wikipedia page, not to mention edit it. My computer is not shared so that rules out others using the same IP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.241.155.210 (talkcontribs)

You did here [1] on June 24th. Momusufan 03:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

My RFA edit

Thanks for your recent support of my RFA! I did not make it through this time, but after some broadening of my experience, I'll be back in short order. Hiberniantears 14:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

How was that Vandalism??? Maybe if you got out from behind your computer and into the real world you would see that what I wrote is not a lie.