Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, S.alethea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nikkimaria (talk) 04:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please leave me comments with your signature , Thank you S.alethea (talk) 06:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia! Drop by the Teahouse anytime for a cup of tea, or some help with editing!

edit
 
Hello! S.alethea, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Message from CaitlinJames

edit

Hello Shadé

Hi! I'm Caitlin! I can give you some help in understanding how to get work done in Wikipedia. I am an undergraduate psychology major at Davidson College. I edited Wikipedia articles last semester as part of a course called Cognitive Psychology. I worked on the article "Misinformation Effect," and I was able to nominate my article for a Did You Know. I found the assignment effective in helping me learn about the topic of the article I edited, the culture and norms of Wikipedia, and writing articles from a neutral point of view. I have learned some valuable lessons while completing my assignment and I will be glad to offer advice based on what I learned.

Click here to reply

InstructorCommentBot (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC) on behalf of CaitlinJames (talk)Reply

Apperceptive agnosia

edit

Hi I have wikified your contribution to the Talk:Apperceptive agnosia, hopefully you will soon begin to make your proposed edits to the article. dolfrog (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

you need different cases history sources, citations, and there were few if any links to other wikipedia articles. A promising start. dolfrog (talk) 11:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Sample patient work from a apperceptive agnosia patient.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sample patient work from a apperceptive agnosia patient.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Picture of a clock drawn by a patient.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of a clock drawn by a patient.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply