Welcome to Wikipedia, Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz! edit

I'm Seagull123 and I want to welcome you to Wikipedia!

Wikipedia is an amazing community adventure which is constantly being edited. There are many different versions of Wikipedia for many different languages, and the English version has 6,817,142 articles which are written by volunteers like you and me! Making your first steps on Wikipedia can be hard sometimes, so if you need any help, don't hesitate to to leave a message on my talk page or ask a question on your talk page under a {{help_me}} tag. Someone will help you soon!

Wikipedia has five pillars which summarise Wikipedia's fundamental principles:

  1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
  2. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
  3. Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
  4. Editors should treat each other with respect and civility
  5. Wikipedia has no firm rules

Discover more about Wikipedia and how to take part in this project by looking at the links on the right →
Or click here to find a random article to edit.

I hope you have a good time here on Wikipedia, whether reading or contributing.

Again, welcome!

 Seagull123  Φ  23:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You can ask or tell me something in German, English or Polish. Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 10:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andrzej Pańta edit

 

The article Andrzej Pańta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I see the Polish discussion also produced some interesting arguments; for now I have no further concerns about this article, but do check the WP:ARTIST notability guideline I linked below, and in your articles, try to make sure it is shown why the subjects are notable as much as possible. Thank you for your contributions, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Notability (artists) edit

Are you familiar with that policy? I am not sure if all of your recent creations (which are appreciated!) meet the criteria it discusses. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

piotrus - how can we use this "notability" for poets/translators? I dont know how! But he is a mediator between the German and Polish Philisophy and poetry. and he himself is a remarkable poet with some prices (that would be since then criterion 2c). I can find some other informations, maybe pseudonym and references. Because of its nature as autistic, he has often had bad luck - some people have stolen his translation rights and he could not fight back. Had he in his appearance "as we" - he would be considered awesome! Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 09:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Józef Baran, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Swedish, Borzęcin and Czech. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

re: and whats the matter with Waldemar Dras? edit

I have no idea what's the matter with Waldemar Dras as I cannot find an article named such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

just not important. my mistake. Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 17:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

{{Rough translation}} edit

Hi, I only added the {{Rough translation}} tag to the page, German-Polish poets steamer, because User:Poeticbent had raised the issue at the article's talk page and that Wikipedia generally discourages against machine-translations. It has been listed at pages needing translation, so hopefully another editor will come along and help with this. The problem is mainly with the High water / Low water section. Please don't take this as a comment on you, rather that to some, this article may not make total sense. Thanks, I hope we can still work together well!  Seagull123  Φ  19:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

will we make a correction. thanks. Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

just done

Disambiguation link notification for December 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrzej Pańta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Esslingen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank! I'll remember! Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Its corrected. Sorry for the mistake. Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grzegorz Stec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michigan City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I will make. Thanks for Information. Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kai Engelke, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German, Taz and Friedland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge edit

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Ruessen-Kleinstorckwitz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Andrzej Walter for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrzej Walter, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrzej Walter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply