Rpgea
Welcome!
editHi Rpgea! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Polygnotus (talk) 06:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Rpgea (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
The article Samson Styles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Refbombed UPE spam for non notable filmmaker. Awards are not major.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, @Rpgea. While you are free to remove the PROD from the article, I would like you to review Wikipedia:Citation overkill, an essay suggesting why adding more than a few citations after a statement is not necessary. This was the original reason for the proposed deletion of the article ("refbombing"). I removed the Daily Mail citation since it is an extremely unreliable source. Regards, win8x (talking | spying) 00:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
You need to take into account what the source is or isn't showing.
Is it verifying that he won election to an WP:NPOL-passing office, meaning that he's inherently notable, meaning that an article must exist? Then it's an article that has to be kept even if the sourcing is temporarily inadequate, because having articles about NPOL-passing politicians is straight-up mandatory.
Is it just verifying that a person exists while not saying anything "inherently" notable about him? Then one source isn't enough.
It all depends on whether the source is supporting an inherent notability claim (like being elected to an office that passes NPOL #1) or not. If it is, then one source is enough, and if it isn't, then one source isn't enough — it depends on the notability or non-notability of what the source is verifying. Bearcat (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.