Rogeman123

Welcome!

Hi Rogeman123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! RFD (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shewa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ifat. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hi it appears recently you added un sourced content on the Mikael of Wollo page, this is additionally called Original information and does not meet Wikipedia’s standards. And for that your edits have since been reverted. You also didn’t provide a edit summary so I advise you that providing an edit summary Is good. Thanks Rashicy (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Unhelpful edits on Amhara related pages, Amhara people and Bete Amhara

You are for some reason trying to diminish the view of literal translations of Bete Amhara which is also mentioned in the source, you have something against Solomon mentioned in the bible. I don't understand your reasoning for your edits, since it's meant to inform readers. I will be reverting them whenever you try to diminish them. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 12:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

I opened a new section in the Bete Amhara page talk page, lets discuss. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 01:10, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Third opinion on Bete Amhara completed

Hello, this is to inform you that I have provided a third opinion on a dispute on Bete Amhara in which you were involved. My response is available on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dndlp (talk) 03:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rogeman123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was correcting the mistake Dawit S Gondaria made in the Amhara people. From “House of Amhara” to “Bete Amhara (lit: House of Amhara)”, in which he agreed was better and accepted that proposal with Landroving Linguist on the talk page. “King Solomon of the Bible” alienates non-Christian readers who also respect him. So I decided to change it to “King Solomon.”Rogeman123 (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Looking at your contributions, it is clear you were edit warring, so the block is valid. PhilKnight (talk) 07:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

West Semitic

No idea why you changed several Ethiopian Semitic languages to West Semitic in their lede (as usual, you keep up your disruptive habit of *not* providing edit summaries). But it is about as useful as starting the English language article as "an Indoeuropean language spoken in Western Eurasia", which is just way too broad. The English language article does not start this way, btw, but calls it West Germanic. LandLing 22:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

I thoroughly agree with both your substantive point and your (presumed) annoyance with this continuing non-collegiate behaviour, LandLing. Neat illustration of the danger of too broad a generalisation, too!

There are other worrying aspects to this user's editing behaviour:

1. lack of a suitable response to the block by User:Drmies
2. the sheer scale of the disruptive behaviour and the waste of other editors' time and efforts.
3. lack of any dialogue whatsoever, whether here (eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rogeman123&diff=next&oldid=1023268169 ) or on article talk pages (eg: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bete_Amhara&oldid=1023703751 ) - is it possible that this user does not understand simple English? If it's not ignorance of the English language and is instead just sheer laziness or contempt for other editors' efforts then it is time to consider a community ban. --01:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC) BushelCandle

September 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Renat 01:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please use edit summaries. I just reverted an edit you made only because I have no idea why you wanted to remove the info. If you would explain in the edit summary, that would make things easier for everyone, including yourself! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amda Seyon I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amda Seyon I, you may be blocked from editing. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 04:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 10:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rogeman123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My intentions were not to edit war nor vandalize the Wiki page, if anything Dawit S Gonderia was edit warring with me. I even provided a source called “Why 3 Ha’s (ሀ/ሐ/ኀ), 2 Sa’s (ሰ/ሠ), 2 A’s (አ/ዐ) and 2 Tse’s (ጸ/ፀ)?“ in the talk page but the user chose to be ignorant about it. The user has not provided a source to prove it’s claim about the spelling at all. And I have tried to explain to Dawit as clear as possible about Amharic spelling and it’s connection to Ge’ez spelling. Dawit S Gonderia should be blocked from editing for edit warring.

Decline reason:

You're blocked for edit warring, not for being wrong. What other people have done is also immaterial to your own block. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before you make another unblock request. This is an open book test. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You provided zero sources, i didn't respond to your offtopic silly comparisons/diversions i'm not here for conversation with you, i debunked your claim at [[1]] Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

አልመቀህ

Hi! I was reviewing Almaqah, & saw that you had added the ግዕዝ form አልመቀህ. I've been trying to find a source for that, but so far haven't been able to find anything from vocalised texts. Do you know of a source that gives the vocalised ግዕዝ form? Much thanks. Pathawi (talk) 12:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)