Robert1900

November 2022

Hello! I'm Bonadea. Your recent edit(s) to the page Elisha Kriis appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add claims that a film has won the Dadasaheb Phalke award. bonadea contributions talk 16:37, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox.

The Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival has no connection to the Dadasaheb Phalke Award. Linking to the article about the notable award when you actually mean the non-notable one is incorrect and disruptive.

In addition, awards that aren't notable are normally not included at all. Please don't add it again. bonadea contributions talk 07:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea, I am doing my best here to understand the issue. so these are the links and evidence..

1-https://urbanasian.com/entertainment/2022/02/highway-nights-wins-1st-runner-up-award-at-dadasaheb-phalke-international-film-festival/

2- photographic evidence of the film makers winning at the event https://www.instagram.com/p/CaSQd9whHad/

3 - https://www.iglobalnews.com/ientertainment/profiles/highway-nights-wins-mumbai-prize-for-heart-warming-short-film with a photo of the award with the team.

Please don't randomly nominate my hard work for vandalism. Guide me if I am wrong.

The award is Dada Saheb Phalke International Film Festival Award. Thanks for the help in advance. Robert1900 (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

You said: The award is Dada Saheb Phalke International Film Festival Award That is exactly my point. The Dada Saheb Phalke International Film Festival Award is not notable, and we usually do not include non-notable awards. --bonadea contributions talk 09:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Bonadea,

Understood. Thank you for correcting my error. Robert1900 (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Travis Cloyd moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Travis Cloyd, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia).

It is also very promotionally written. Don't build an article around quotes from the person. In fact, Wikipedia is not interested in what someone says about themselves, but in what other people unconnected to them have to say.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 07:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance bonadea. I will sit with this and incubate the article in my draftspace. I will make the necessary changes and remove the quotes to keep it neutral. Revisit all my independent sources and when all guidelines are met,,I will resubmit it. Thanks! Robert1900 (talk) 07:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Do not move this back to mainspace yourself. It is far from being acceptable as an article – there is no claim to notability and it is very promotionally written. Much of the information is unsourced, which is unacceptable, particularly in a biography about a living person. See also the question below. --bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Robert1900. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Robert1900. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Robert1900|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC) Bonadea I have made this article as contribution from my end after reading countless articles on subject of Metaverse and VR which is a fairly new technology. I am not paid a single penny to make these changes. I followed all your instructions and yet I am doing many things wrong. I shall patiently wait for other to correct an article that I have made from scratch. Please be assured my contribution is genuine and I am still learning to do my best as a a contributor. Thank you for guiding me.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jared19921j per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jared19921j. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 08:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Travis Cloyd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travis Cloyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Cloyd (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

firefly ( t · c ) 08:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)