Your Teahouse question

edit

You didn't get any responses but let me see what I can do.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I made some minor changes to the article but it really does need a lot of work. If you click on the blue links in the notice at the top of the page you can see what they mean. I don't agree that the article is written like an advertisement but it doesn't have a lot of detail. If you have a close connection with the subject, once your information appears in the article, there's not a lot that can be done other than removing all of your work and starting over, and you have to disclose a conflict of interest if there is one. What is necessary is independent reliable sources that cover the subject in detail with a neutral point of view.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The point is I have not been tutored as most of the topics are. They were written by the very people involved. I did not add this with an eye for advertising, no one pays after reading my wiki. It was done in good faith. That’s all. Riyers (talk) 03:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Vaasta moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Vaasta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Riyers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Vaasta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Your account appears to be related to the production company Riyers. Please disclose this. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sunderkand - Let love find you (2020) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Sunderkand - Let love find you (2020), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sunderkand - Let love find you (2020)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sunderkand - Let love find you (2020), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lavalizard101 (talk) 00:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit
 
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Bbb23 (talk) 01:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kadambari Danave

edit
 

The article Kadambari Danave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable beauty contestant, model and actress

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply