Richard Calthrope
October 2023
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Race (human categorization) are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rsk6400 (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- My edit is clearly intended to question the validity of the source to derive the article text in question. The improvement would be revising the text or finding a better source. Richard Calthrope (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- As you can see, I was not only editor disagreeing with you. Rsk6400 (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Disagreeing with me? You two simply removed my comment. This will have to be reported. Richard Calthrope (talk) 07:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- As you can see, I was not only editor disagreeing with you. Rsk6400 (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Lourdes 08:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC) |
Richard Calthrope (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
A sockpuppet of whom? Violating policy? I am drawing attention to a policy violation.[1] The editors I refer to are committing a policy violation. Orwellian. Richard Calthrope (talk) 08:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Obvious sock puppetry is obvious. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|"Obvious sock puppetry is obvious." Then who am I a sockpuppet of? [[User:Richard Calthrope|Richard Calthrope]] ([[User talk:Richard Calthrope#top|talk]]) 08:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)}} We don't need to know who specificallly you are a sock of to know that you are socking. I presume you know who you are. It's quite obvious that you are not new at this. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Richard Calthrope (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You do need to show specifically who I am a sockpuppet of, with evidence, to conform to Wikipedia's policies on arbitrary blocks and abuse of admin tools. Richard Calthrope (talk) 08:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Nonsense. Yamla (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- TPA revoked. Lourdes 09:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)