Your submission at Articles for creation: Pike Powers (September 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Reward3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I have edited the submission, removing the "peacock language." I hope this version is more suitable. I had wanted to submit it to you all, Teahouse, or some of the wonderful folks in the Help Space but couldn't find the intermediary "save" mechanism without re-submitting. Headed to Teahouse! Raye Reward3 (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Resubmission

edit

I know how busy everyone is: thank you SO much for the alert about style and viewpoint. I believe my recent changes mitigate your concerns, by removing the florid adjectives and adding government-vetted references to size Mr. Powers' contributions. He was a remarkable builder of communities and people, and would have been extremely excited to know this page is in the works. Thank you for all of your help! Raye Reward3 (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Any feedback on my Pike Powers submission

edit

Greetings All -- Just to be clear: I am not being paid for this. It is a labor of respect to honor Pike Powers, one of the great builders of this region. Does anyone have any feedback on the resubmission. Is it okay? Thank you! Raye Reward3 (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pike Powers (January 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pike Powers (March 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for your edits on the Pike Powers submission. Yours and the other reviewers' work has made it a better piece, such that it takes in a bigger picture than the personal. Thank you! Raye
p.s. I hope the resubmission reflects this. Reward3 (talk) 17:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pike Powers (May 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
––FormalDude (talk) 03:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pike Powers has been accepted

edit
 
Pike Powers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––FormalDude (talk) 02:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Photo Permissions contact.

edit

Folks, I've lost track of how to contact the Wikimedia folks who removed the photos I was securing permissions for, which requires going through the news editor to his lawyer. The photos were taken down within a week, and I'd like to get back to the Wikimedian who directed me to the legal form. I get the necessity of this, I've just lost the navigation and the person's handle. Thank you! Reward3 (talk) 23:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply