User talk:RevelationDirect/Archive 2018

2018

edit

Category:Phi Beta Pi Medical Fraternity

edit

IMO, just as the article is Phi Beta Pi, the category should be as well. Opinion?Naraht (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Naraht: Yeah, I agree, along with Category:Phi Chi Medical Fraternity. You want to submit that or should I? RevelationDirect (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Go ahead. I'm Seeing if I can find any others that are similar. Only one that leaps out when I do a regex search is Category:Chi Psi Fraternity, which I think needs to as well.. Kappa Alpha Society, Kappa Alpha Order and Delta Phi Epsilon (social) have cats named after them, but they match the article.Naraht (talk) 21:45, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
All 3 submitted for speedy renaming. RevelationDirect (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanx.Naraht (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mark Hatfield

edit

Mark Hatfield served as the National Third Vice President of Alpha Phi Omega. I have added that fact and the reference thereof to the article (though I'm not thrilled with where I put it). As such, I have added him back into the Alpha Phi Omega category. (IMO, none of the people on List of Alpha Phi Omega members belong there other that Hatfield, Frank Reed Horton, and H. Roe Bartle. (The last two served as the first two National President of Alpha Phi Omega.Naraht (talk) 21:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

OK, sounds good. If they're a national leader that's certainly defining. A lot of the biography articles are so short it's hard to tell what attributes are defining. Some of these organizations have a list articles of members/brothers/sisters which is a better format. RevelationDirect (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oh, absolutely. I'm probably responsible for 95% of List of Alpha Phi Omega members.Naraht (talk) 22:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:WPIX has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:WPIX, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply