Your submission at Articles for creation: André Armenante (January 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the review, will look for more suitable sources and publications to correct this draft. RealmUnknown (talk) 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RealmUnknown! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interests edit

Hi. Please would you read WP:Paid editing and WP:Conflict of interest and ensure that you are complying with required components. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Of course, sure thing RealmUnknown (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Upon review, I can comfortably say that I do comply in the sense that I am not paid nor affiliated with the individual the article is about. However, I am not entirely sure how to proceed if there are issues surrounding it. This particular article is more or less my "first attempt" in making a fresh article from the ground up. RealmUnknown (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Armenante (March 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:  The comment the reviewer left was:
Thank you for the review! I'll take another crack at it with a more neutral lens. Was utilizing other article archetypes as a general bases of understanding flow and potential section content; such as other magicians and entertainers who have articles on the site. RealmUnknown (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Spinster300 (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Armenante (March 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ANUwrites 22:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the review!
I do agree that some of the sources are a brief in discussing the subject. However, The Genii and NBC sources are full interviews/articles with the subject. While the others are included for sourcing with the awards, creations, copyrights, etc directly about the subject or the subject's materials. HolograFX being the main staple, thus resulted in the most sources that I could locate from online archives and searches.
Thanks again, will see if I can dig up any other interviews or articles relating to the subject. RealmUnknown (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply