User talk:Raymond Cruise/Archive2009/5

SD Logroñés

edit

En este tipo de provincias es más facil crear un equipo cada año que mantenerlo (hasta preferente, de risa, mientras en Madrid o Cataluña 8 o 9 niveles). Lo han creado aficionados del CD Logroñés, se podian haber esperado a que desapareciese, esto es enterrar al muerto antes de que muera, ellos no lo consideran un engendro, si su sucesor, ya veremos cuanto tarda en reclamar su historia y nombre.

Dicen que si continua vivo el CDL le ceden su plaza (jajaja, no se lo creen ni ellos). ZZ86 (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Raymond Cruise. You have new messages at Talk:CA Marbella.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rettetast (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please see Talk:CA Marbella again. Rettetast (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

UD Logroñés

edit

Hola Raymond, iba a escribirte en inglés pero parece que no hace falta, jeje. Así me será más fácil intentar explicar la rocambolesca situación futbolística que vivimos en Logroño. He visto que trasladasteis CD Varea a UD Logroñés, y aunque en principio es correcto, ya que lo que han hecho es cambiarle el nombre al Varea, se supone que el barrio de Varea seguirá contando con un equipo de fútbol y toda su estructura de base, mientras que el UD Logroñés será un equipo independiente, pero bueno, a medida que avance el verano seguirán aclarandose las cosas, mientras que en el resto de España seguirán flipando con tanto equipo: CD Logroñés, ADF Logroñés, Logroñés CF, SD Logroñés y UD Logroñés. Cheers, Pablovp (talk) 23:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

El problema está en que la poca afición que queda en Logroño, vuelve a dividirse de nuevo tras la más que probable desaparición definitiva del CD Logroñés, y se abren dos vías, la SD Logroñés y la UD Logroñés. Veremos al final quien se lleva el gato al agua o si acabamos teniendo derby en Primera División, jajaja. Cheers, Pablovp (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tampere United.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Tampere United.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Manchego CF

edit

He estado revisando el historial reciente del artículo sobre el Manchego CF y he visto que lo das como desaparecido. En tanto que esto no es cierto, lo cual te explicaré después, faltas al respeto (todavía no sé a quién) en una edición posterior escribiendo "ya llegó el catedratico y el Shakespeare, salva tu el manchego, no te jode". Primero, porque los insultos aquí sobran, y segundo, porque aquí nadie tiene la necesidad de meterse en los asuntos de terceros, sino de ajustarse a la realidad, que dice que a día de hoy, 1 de agosto, a las siete y veinte pasadas de la tarde, el Manchego ni ha notificado a la FFCM que se retira, ni los han descendido a Preferente. Es más, si por la circunstancia que sea todos los jugadores retiraran las denuncias (ahora mismo lo han hecho todos salvo Villacorta), no habría impedimento para que el equipo saliera a competir en Tercera. Otra cosa es lo que pasara a largo plazo con la millonaria deuda que arrastran en otros conceptos. Referencias: 1, 2, 3...

No pienso mantener aquí un debate sobre quién debería salvar al Manchego. Me parece genial que quieras mantener cuantos más artículos sobre clubes mejor, pero haz el favor de contrastar fuentes y no descalificar a la primera de cambio.

Un saludo. --Stage7 (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Si desaparece no es mi problema, sino el de su masa social. Mientras tanto, no digas que han desaparecido, porque no lo han hecho. Búscate otro objetivo. --Stage7 (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Granada 74

edit

Raymond, en el artículo del Granada 74 pones que no competirá en ninguna competición la próxima temporada. ¿El club ha desaparecido? Qampunen (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Baloncesto Fuenlabrada.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Baloncesto Fuenlabrada.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Asociación de Clubs de Baloncesto.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Asociación de Clubs de Baloncesto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Addison Alves de Oliveira

edit
 

The article Addison Alves de Oliveira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 18:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

KBVU

edit

Just wanted to drop by quickly to ask why you chose to pipe KCVU into the link for KBVU (TV) on this disambiguation page? The KBVU (TV) link that was there is already a redirect to KCVU, and piping links on dab pages is generally discouraged. I'm sure you have a logical reason for the change, but it just wasn't easily apparent to me. Thanks, Mlaffs (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

N442

edit

Hi! What is your source for List of national roads in Spain? When I look on the internet, the endpoint of the N442 everywhere else seems to be given as Mazagón rather than San José. - Andre Engels (talk) 08:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


Orphaned non-free image (File:LaSexta.jpg)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:LaSexta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 02:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mateo Roskam

edit
 

The article Mateo Roskam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league (never above Spain's Segunda B) and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 18:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Málaga.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CD Málaga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:FS Zamora.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:FS Zamora.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CF Reus Deportiu.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CF Reus Deportiu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply